| C
H E C K T H I S O U T |
| TWO VIEWS OF THE HEALTH CARE PLAN - Helen Burleson
Dear Conductors, These are very interesting assessments of the problems OUR PRESIDENT is having with the health care reform. The first is from one of our Beloved White Conductors, Bob, and the second is from a Black university professor, Dr. Karenga. Both arrive at the same conclusion though expressed in different ways. Please read both carefully and share them, especially with the naive who either do not know, or pretend not to know what all the furor is about. We have got to contact our representatives to give them intelligent and informed reasons why they must fight for the public option so that ALL AMERICANS can enjoy the benefits of quality health and wellness care. The article from Dr. Karenga was sent to me by our Beloved Conductor, Gloria. Helen
From Bob:
When Bush was in the White house NO one made claims that he was Hitler.
Yet he lied about Iraq and we went to war. He took a country that was in
the black and spent so much money on Iraq that we were hopelessly in
the red before he left office. The economy also went into the toilet
because of Iraq and other reason we all know.
Obama comes in says he wants to reform health care and all everyone does
is complain. It doesn't matter what he does people complain.Yet he
campaigned on Health care reform and won 87 % of the votes.
The Republican fight with the Democrats or the democrats fight with the
republican. It doesn't matter NOTHING is getting done.
People the whole world is watching us make asses out of our selves and
laughing at us..... Let's Knock off the crap and give the man the same
respect we would if he were a white man. How can we treat him so
poorly ? We didn't treat Bush this way and Bush lied about war.
For all of you complaining about Health care, if you have it,,, its run
by politics now. When you get older it will be run by the government. It's
called Medicare.
This is why it must be about his race, if not then what ?
From Dr. Karenga:
BLAMING WHITE ANXIETY ON OBAMA:
PROXY PROTESTS AND RACIAL RAGE
Los Angeles Sentinel, 08-20-09, p. A7
DR. MAULANA KARENGA
No one who is honest, serious or sane, can truthfully deny that President Obama has done all he can do, without irreparable damage to his dignity and sense of self, to put Whites at ease about him, his patriotism, his plans and his dedication to a post-racial, post-partisan and truly just America. Not since Dr. Martin Luther King’s initiative to reassure and involve Whites in creating a just and good society, and to offer possibilities and opportunities for redemption of even the most unrepentant racists, have we witnessed such an effort, even given the obvious differences.
During the campaign and after his election, Obama has practiced a judicious racial self-concealment and an office-based distancing from his community at given times to make Whites feel more a part of his project for the country. Moreover, he put aside the expansive multicultural model of government promised, at least for now, and surrounded himself with an abundance and variety of Whites. And he has bowed out and backtracked when they have questioned the text, tone, and appropriateness of his statements, especially where they could be racially misread as an expression of Black anger or “a Black thing” Whites might not understand or appreciate.
And yet there are some Whites who for clear or closeted racial “reasons” will not give him rest, relief or credit and who, as one of their favorite talk-show hosts and heroes has said, are dedicated to discrediting him and making him fail. Thus, in spite of a litany of denials and labored alternative explanations about the intense and aggressive rage and racial rant against his health care proposal, they bear serious signs of proxy protests against him, reflecting the racial antipathy some Whites feel concerning him, and the racial anxiety they have about themselves, current conditions and the future.
There is no need to deny the complex source of their anxiety and rage, i.e., the state of the economy, disinformation, misinformation, self-cultivated unawareness, fear of an uncertain future, real disagreement, “democracy at work”, prior similar patterns of other major policy proposals, and manipulation by Republicans, insurance and pharmaceutical companies and an assortment of right-wing groups. But the essential character of this confrontation and conversation is its rootedness in racial anxiety and antipathy.
Thus, the racial slurs on their signs, their hateful words, and their aggressive behavior are directed not so much against Obama’s health care proposal, but against him. There is a continuing racial rage which began during the campaign and rises out of a sense of loss of power and position to one and others less worthy, a reversal of the social, even natural, order in racialized thinking.
Therefore, it is not simply a town hall rage, but one which is rooted in a larger societal anger and anxiety. It is in the media and the political culture itself—residual, recurrent and continuing racism.
It is in the general criticism of him as “a joker with a chip on his shoulder, creating chaos and crisis, wearing a mask to fool White people”. Others burn Obama in effigy at the rallies, wear guns openly and suggest “the trees of liberty must be watered” with someone’s (?) blood. In this miasmic mix emerge so-called “birthers”, fixated on proving, against all evidence, that Obama is “foreign-born” and thus ineligible and unworthy of being President. Then, too, there are those who ask, as if it had real merit or sensible meaning, “can we still call the White House White with a Black man, indeed a Black family in residence in it?” I’m not sure what more Obama can do to deal with White anxiety and antipathy. In addition to the things mentioned above, he has assured them of their greatness, generosity and capacity for kindness and offered beer for racial bonding at the White House. And he has committed himself and asked us not to remind them of past racial injustice or call current racial injustice by its real name. Furthermore, Obama has spared them the public lectures on personal and communal responsibility he has given us. Indeed, he refuses to engage racial discourse, except on ceremonious occasions to note how far we, as a country, have moved from it. But race still matters and has developed a life of its own, as a social and psychological virus resistant to reason or any remedy, except the struggle for and achievement of deep-rooted social change. The left and liberals have not been as assertive as needed in this debate. This is partially due to a sense that Obama has not fulfilled and even gone back on some of his campaign promises. But as Paul Robeson said, “the battlefront is everywhere. There is no sheltered rear”. Thus, even if we can’t, for good reasons, support Obama in some areas, there are still other areas in which he takes and maintains a progressive stand and there progressives should stand with him in defense and struggle for what is just, good and right in this country and the world.
Such a site of rightful support and struggle is the issue of universal health care. President Obama’s health care proposal carries within it stipulations to alter ways that the insurance companies do business negative to human life and well-being. It would, among other things, bar them from denying coverage because of pre-existing conditions; dropping a patient if s/he gets ill; reducing coverage at critical times; increasing without limit out-of-pocket expenses; and placing a cap on the amount of coverage one can have in a year or a lifetime. And it would also cover preventive care, routine check-ups, screening and tests to insure ongoing health and well-being. Moreover, Obama’s “public option”, i.e., government-provided insurance, must remain a part of his proposal. He must not cave in to corporate and right-wing campaigns to discredit it and convince the majority of American Whites, even poor and needy ones, this proposal is bad for them. But it’s White racialized thinking that makes them susceptible to this discrediting. For many, who already have and benefit from Medicare and Medicaid, government sponsored programs, feel compelled to go against their own interests, if it means sharing with the less worthy, the poor and/or people of color.
Again, we must realize the health care struggle is linked to a larger one, the struggle against racial or class dominance of any group, against racialized conceptions and approaches to human life. And it is a struggle to insure the health and well-being of all, and to open up the horizons of history and human possibility in new, elevated and ever-expansive ways. Dr. Maulana Karenga, Professor of Africana Studies, California State University-Long Beach, Chair of The Organization Us, Creator of Kwanzaa, and author of Kawaida and Questions of Life and Struggle: African American, Pan-African and Global Issues
www.MaulanaKarenga.org www.Us-Organization.org www.OfficialKwanzaaWebsite.org
This is the original text of the bill as it was written by its sponsor and submitted to the House for consideration.
Text of H.R. 1964: National Black Clergy for the Elimination of HIV/AIDS Act of 2009
|
JOE MADISON TO HOST A ROUNDTABLE DISCUSSION MARKING PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA’S 100TH DAY EXCLUSIVELY ON XM RADIO
XM host Joe Madison examines President Obama’s performance and takes a look at the challenges ahead of his presidency
Guests include Rep. James Clyburn, Howard Dean, Rep. Barney Frank, Danny Glover, Louis Gossett Jr., Dick Gregory, Rep. Charles Rangel and Helen Thomas
NEW YORK – April 27, 2009 – SIRIUS XM Radio (NASDAQ: SIRI) today announced it will broadcast “The Power Breakfast,” a special edition of The Joe Madison Show, featuring analysis of President Barack Obama’s first 100-days in office. “The Power Breakfast,” hosted by Joe Madison, will be broadcast on The Power, XM channel 169, on Thursday, April 30 starting at 6 am ET.
For “The Power Breakfast” edition of The Joe Madison Show, Madison has invited congressional leaders, political pundits, celebrity guests and activists to evaluate President Obama’s policies on issues including the economy, homeland security, education, foreign affairs and the state of race relations since his historic election. 20
XM listeners will hear live panel discussions with leading members from the House of Representatives, including Rep. James Clyburn, Majority Whip for the 110th Congress; Rep. John Conyers; Rep. Barney Frank, Chairman of the Financial Services Committee; Rep. Charles Rangel, Chairman of Ways and Means Committee; Rep. Bennie Thompson, Chairman of the Homeland Security Committee; and Rep. Donald Payne, past Chairman of the Congressional Black Caucus.
XM listeners will also hear celebrity activists, including David Banner, Danny Glover, Louis Gossett Jr., Dick Gregory and Ahmir Khalib Thompson (aka, Questlove from The Roots), as well as former DNC Chairman Howard Dean; Janet Langhart Cohen, author, producer and wife of former Secretary of Defense William Cohen; Jonathan Rodgers, President of TV-One; Bill Lucy, Secretary-Treasurer of AFSCME Union; and veteran White House correspondent Helen Thomas.
The Joe Madison Show, hosted by Joe “The Black Eagle” Madison, features Madison talking about politics and social activism, challenging the status quo and advocating for people of color ensuring20that they are not undervalued, underestimated, or marginalized. The Joe Madison Show is broadcast exclusively on The Power, XM channel 169, weekday mornings starting at 6 am ET.
XM Radio host Joe Madison is a human and civil rights activist, abolitionist against slavery in Sudan and genocide in Darfur, television commentator, columnist and lecturer. Talkers Magazine recently ranked Joe #12 of the 100 most important radio talk show hosts in America. Joe Madison has combined his role as a civil rights activist and media personality to impact public policy in the nation and around the world.
|
Obama's Minister Committed "Treason" But When My Father Said the Same Thing He Was a Republican Hero
Posted March 16, 2008 | 04:23 PM (EST)
When Senator Obama's preacher thundered about racism and injustice Obama suffered smear-by-association. But when my late father -- Religious Right leader Francis Schaeffer -- denounced America and even called for the violent overthrow of the US government, he was invited to lunch with presidents Ford, Reagan and Bush, Sr.
Every Sunday thousands of right wing white preachers (following in my father's footsteps) rail against America's sins from tens of thousands of pulpits. They tell us that America is complicit in the "murder of the unborn," has become "Sodom" by coddling gays, and that our public schools are sinful places full of evolutionists and sex educators hell-bent on corrupting children. They say, as my dad often did, that we are, "under the judgment of God." They call America evil and warn of immanent destruction. By comparison Obama's minister's shouted "controversial" comments were mild. All he said was that God should damn America for our racism and violence and that no one had ever used the N-word about Hillary Clinton.
Dad and I were amongst the founders of the Religious right. In the 1970s and 1980s, while Dad and I crisscrossed America denouncing our nation's sins instead of getting in trouble we became darlings of the Republican Party. (This was while I was my father's sidekick before I dropped out of the evangelical movement altogether.) We were rewarded for our "stand" by people such as Congressman Jack Kemp, the Fords, Reagan and the Bush family. The top Republican leadership depended on preachers and agitators like us to energize their rank and file. No one called us un-American.
Consider a few passages from my father's immensely influential America-bashing book A Christian Manifesto. It sailed under the radar of the major media who, back when it was published in 1980, were not paying particular attention to best-selling religious books. Nevertheless it sold more than a million copies.
Here's Dad writing in his chapter on civil disobedience:
If there is a legitimate reason for the use of force [against the US government]... then at a certain point force is justifiable.
And this:
In the United States the materialistic, humanistic world view is being taught exclusively in most state schools... There is an obvious parallel between this and the situation in Russia [the USSR]. And we really must not be blind to the fact that indeed in the public schools in the United States all religious influence is as forcibly forbidden as in the Soviet Union....
Then this:
There does come a time when force, even physical force, is appropriate... A true Christian in Hitler's Germany and in the occupied countries should have defied the false and counterfeit state. This brings us to a current issue that is crucial for the future of the church in the United States, the issue of abortion... It is time we consciously realize that when any office commands what is contrary to God's law it abrogates it's authority. And our loyalty to the God who gave this law then requires that we make the appropriate response in that situation...
Was any conservative political leader associated with Dad running for cover? Far from it. Dad was a frequent guest of the Kemps, had lunch with the Fords, stayed in the White House as their guest, he met with Reagan, helped Dr. C. Everett Koop become Surgeon General. (I went on the 700 Club several times to generate support for Koop).
Dad became a hero to the evangelical community and a leading political instigator. When Dad died in 1984 everyone from Reagan to Kemp to Billy Graham lamented his passing publicly as the loss of a great American. Not one Republican leader was ever asked to denounce my dad or distanced himself from Dad's statements.
Take Dad's words and put them in the mouth of Obama's preacher (or in the mouth of any black American preacher) and people would be accusing that preacher of treason. Yet when we of the white Religious Right denounced America white conservative Americans and top political leaders, called our words "godly" and "prophetic" and a "call to repentance."
We Republican agitators of the mid 1970s to the late 1980s were genuinely anti-American in the same spirit that later Jerry Falwell and Pat Robertson (both followers of my father) were anti-American when they said God had removed his blessing from America on 9/11, because America accepted gays. Falwell and Robertson recanted but we never did.
My dad's books denouncing America and comparing the USA to Hitler are still best sellers in the "respectable" evangelical community and he's still hailed as a prophet by many Republican leaders. When Mike Huckabee was recently asked by Katie Couric to name one book he'd take with him to a desert island, besides the Bible, he named Dad's Whatever Happened to the Human Race? a book where Dad also compared America to Hitler's Germany.
The hypocrisy of the right denouncing Obama, because of his minister's words, is staggering. They are the same people who argue for the right to "bear arms" as "insurance" to limit government power. They are the same people that (in the early 1980s roared and cheered when I called down damnation on America as "fallen away from God" at their national meetings where I was keynote speaker, including the annual meeting of the ultraconservative Southern Baptist convention, and the religious broadcasters that I addressed.
Today we have a marriage of convenience between the right wing fundamentalists who hate Obama, and the "progressive" Clintons who are playing the race card through their own smear machine. As Jane Smiley writes in the Huffington Post "[The Clinton's] are, indeed, now part of the 'vast right wing conspiracy.' (http://www.huffingtonpost.com/jane-smiley/im-already-against-the-n_b_90628.html )
Both the far right Republicans and the stop-at-nothing Clintons are using the "scandal" of Obama's preacher to undermine the first black American candidate with a serious shot at the presidency. Funny thing is, the racist Clinton/Far Right smear machine proves that Obama's minister had a valid point. There is plenty to yell about these days.
Frank Schaeffer is a writer and author of "CRAZY FOR GOD-How I Grew Up As One Of The Elect, Helped Found The Religious Right, And Lived To Take All (Or Almost All) Of It Back
|
What Conspiracy? Talk Radio's Roar, From Right & Left
Bill Press is a smart and thoughtful liberal who has had a long and successful career in the TV and radio punditry biz. Yet there he was in Sunday's Post bemoaning the loss of "Obama 1260," the left-leaning Washington talk radio station that morphed into an all-financial advice outlet this week.
The way Press tells it, the loss of that format on WWRC, which had so few listeners it sometimes didn't register at all in the Arbitron ratings, amounts to an unfair allocation of the public airwaves, even a conspiracy to silence voices from the left.
Press is so exercised about this--his syndicated show was, after all, the morning drivetime programming on the station--that he's even calling for the return of the Fairness Doctrine, the long-discarded regulatory scheme by which the federal government prevented radio and TV stations from airing much in the way of controversial political programming.
Despite the passionate desire of some Democrats to see the likes of Rush Limbaugh silenced through regulatory trickery, the fact is that no one is going to restore a set of rules that made no sense when they were erased in 1987 and would be downright absurd in the digital age. More on that in a moment, but first, just a couple of facts:
Much as Press may lament the loss of his Washington outlet, it's simply not even close to true that, as he puts it, with the demise of Obama 1260, "our nation's capital, where Democrats control the House, the Senate and the White House, and where Democrats outnumber Republicans 10 to one, will have no progressive voices on the air."
Yes, the #8-rated station in the market, WMAL (630 AM), airs non-stop conservative talk hosts of the Limbaugh/Sean Hannity/Mark Levin ilk. And another right-wing talk station, WTNT (570 AM), the corporate sister of Obama 1260, will remain on the air despite scoring ratings every bit as anemic as the liberal talkers received.

Michael Baisden has been a reliable supporter
of Barack Obama. (Courtesy of Michael
Baisden)
But Press conveniently left out a plethora of liberal talkers heard every day in this market, from the market's #1 station, WHUR (96.3 FM), which features the Michael Baisden Show, which was a nonstop Obama campaign machine throughout the fall, to the #3 station in the market, Majic 102.3, where the morning host is Tom Joyner, a reliably liberal voice whose lovesong to Obama is currently featured on the station's home page. The liberal lineup includes another all-talk station, WOL (1450 AM), where hosts such as Joe Madison and Al Sharpton dish out just as partisan and powerful a menu of provocative talk as do the yakkers of the right.
Why didn't Press include any of these shows or stations in his rant against the purported domination of the airwaves by conservative voices? Might it be because all of the above hosts are black and their shows air on stations that are black-run and oriented toward a black audience? Blacks are the most devoted radio listeners in this or any other U.S. market. Why are they ignored in the liberal argument that radio is an all-right-wing zone?
But liberal voices on the radio in Washington are not limited to what the industry calls "urban" radio. Pacifica's WPFW (89.3 FM) offers the daily "Democracy Now!" news and commentary program, hosted by Amy Goodman, one of the country's leading left-wing voices, as well as at least five other hours a day of news and talk from a left, and often radical left, perspective. Then there's public radio: Although National Public Radio in recent years has made a concerted and generally successful effort to include more conservative voices in its commentaries and other programming, the fact remains that its audience skews liberal, and that colors many of the call-in and other talk shows on public radio.
As I've argued in a piece on Slate.com, there is yet another oasis of liberal, or at least left libertarian, expression on the radio, and that is the shock jocks and morning zoo shows that are generally not thought of as political programming, but which nonetheless consist of hours and hours of rants on behalf of civil liberties, sexual freedom, and the rights of the little guy against the nation's big corporations and institutions.
So, do Press and like-minded listeners really want a return to the Fairness Doctrine, or are they just jealous that Limbaugh and a couple of other conservative talkers continue to draw strong ratings even as most of the old media lose audience to newfangled communications streams?
Perhaps Press is merely frustrated by the low ratings numbers he and his colleagues draw. Nobody wants to go back to the days when the FCC mandated how and when "opposing voices" might get their moment on the air ("Yes, sir, we'd be glad to put that on the air; would you prefer 4 a.m. on Sunday, or 3 a.m. on Monday?") And nobody wants to return to the bland tripe that aired on most talk stations before the repeal of the Fairness Doctrine opened the airwaves to all voices.
But in the end, the main reason there will be no new Fairness Doctrine is that time and technology have left the old concept of talk radio in the dust. On the Internet, a cacophony of voices ring out, most of them reaching hardly anyone, and nearly all of them being heard only by like-minded people. The real information problem our society faces has nothing to do with one perspective being drowned out by another; rather, our deepening media problem is that we are cleaving into two societies, each with its own, separate version of the truth, each startlingly segregated from the other.
The glory of the new media era is that anyone and everyone can sing out their message. The flip side of that democratic blossoming of voices is that without the scarcity of outlets that once forced us all to share the same information, we can and do drift off into separate realities. Drowning in an ocean of digitalia, we see and hear each other less than ever before.
|
2009 Inaugural Ball
Guests began arriving early. There are no place cards and no name tags.
Everyone knows everyone else here. Now, there's a grand foursome - Malcolm X
and Betty Shabazz sharing laughs with Martin and Coretta Scott King. Looks like
Hosea Williams refused the limo again, keeping it real. And my goodness; is that
Rosa Parks out there on the dance floor with A. Phillip Randolph? Seated at a
nearby table, Frederick Douglass has a captive audience in W.E.B. DuBois and
Fannie Lou Hamer, and Medgar Evers has just
joined them.
Marian Anderson was asked to sing tonight, but she only agreed to do it if
accompanied by Marvin Gaye, John Lennon and Jimi Hendrix. Look, there's
Harriet Tubman. No one knows how she arrived, but there she is. And my guess is
that, when the time comes, no one will see her leave. There's Jackie
Robinson swiftly making his way through the hall as the crowd parts like the Red
Sea to the unmistakable sound of applause. "Run, Jackie, run!"Along
the way he is embraced by Jessie Owens.
Three beautiful young women arrive with their escorts - Schwerner, Goodman
and Chaney. Ms. Viola Liuzzo flew in from Michigan, exclaiming, "I could
not miss this." Richard Pryor promised to be on his best behavior.
"But I can't make any guarantees for Redd Foxx and Moms Mabley,"
he chuckled. Joe Louis just faked a quick jab to the chin of Jack Johnson, who
smiled broadly while slipping it. We saw Billy Eckstine and Nat King Cole greet
Luther Van Dross. James Brown and Josh Gibson stopped at Walter Payton's
table to say hello.
I spotted Congressman Adam Clayton Powell of Harlem having a lively political
discussion with Eldredge Cleaver. Pearl Harbor WWII hero Dorey Miller shared a
few thoughts with Crispus Attucks, a hero of the Revolutionary War. And there is
Madam C.J. Walker talking with Marcus Garvey about exporting goods to Africa.
General Benjamin O. Davis flew into Washington safely with an escort from the
99th Fighter Squadron - better known as The Tuskegee Airman. At the table on the
left are three formidable women - Shirley Chisholm, Sojourner Truth, and Barbara
Jordan - gathered for a little girl-talk... about world politics. As usual, all
the
science nerds seem to have gathered off in a corner, talking shop.
There's Granville T. Woods and Lewis Latimer needling each other about
whose inventions are better. Someone jokingly asked Benjamin Banneker if he had
needed directions to Washington. And George Washington Carver was overheard
asking, "What, no peanuts?"
Dualing bands? Anytime Duke Ellington and Count Basie get together, you knowthe
place will be jumping. Tonight is special, of course, so we have Miles, Dizzy,
and Satchmo sitting in on trumpet, with Coltrane, Cannonball, and Bird on sax.
Everyone's attention is directed to the
dance floor where Bill "Bojangles" Robinson is tap dancing. Right
beside him is Sammy Davis Jr., doing his Bojangles routine. And
behind his back, Gregory Hines is imitating them both. Applause and laughter
abound! The Hollywood contingent has just arrived from the Coast. Led by
filmmaker Oscar Micheau, Paul Robeson, Cana a Lee, and Hattie McDaniel, they
find their way to their tables. DorothyDandridge, looking exquisite in gold
lamé, is seen signaling to her husband, Harold Nicholas, who is standing on the
floor with brother Fayard watching Gregory Hines dance. "Hold me
back," quips Harold, "before I show that youngster how it's
done." Much laughter!
Then a sudden hush comes over the room. The guests of honor have arrived.
The President and Mrs. Obama looked out across the enormous ballroom at all the
historic faces. Very many smiles, precious few dry eyes. Someone shouted out,
"You did it! You did it!" And President Obama replied, "No sir,
you did it; you all - each and every one of you - did it. Your guidance and
encouragement; your hard work and perseverance. .." Obama paused, perhaps
holding back a tear. "I look at your faces - your beautiful faces - and I
am reminded that The White House was built by faces that looked just like yours.
On October 3, 1792, the cornerstone of the White House was laid, and the
foundations and main residence of The White House were built mostly by both
enslaved and free African Americans and paid Europeans. In fact, most of
the other construction work was performed by immigrants, many of whom had not
yet become citizens. Much of the brick and plaster work was performed by Irish
and Italian immigrants. The sandstone walls were built by Scottish immigrants.
So, I guess what I'm trying to say is that The White House is, ultimately,
The People's House, with each President serving as its steward. Since 1792
The People have trimmed its hedges, mowed its lawn, stood guard at the gate,
cooked meals in the kitchen, and scrubbed its toilet bowls. But 216 years later,
The People are taking it back! "Today, Michelle and I usher in a new era.
But while we and our family look toward the future with so much hope, we know
that we must also acknowledge fully this milestone in our journey. We want to
thank each and every one of you for all you have done to make this day possible.
I stand here before you, humbled and in awe of your accomplishments and
sacrifice, and I will dedicate my Presidency, in your honor, to the principles
of peace, liberty and freedom.
If it ever appears that I'm forgetting that, I know Ican count on you to
remind me."
Then he pointed to me near the stage..."Kenyada, isn't it time for you
to
wake up for work?
Isn't it time for all of us to wake up and get to work?" Suddenly I
awake and sit up in bed with a knowing smile. My wife stirs and sleepily asks
if I'm OK. "I've never been better," I replied, "Never
better. It's gonna be a good day."
A 78 year-old Black Woman's response to Michelle Obama's statement
As a 78 year old American of African descent, I feel compelled to respond to all this "much ado about nothing" when it comes to the statement that Michelle Obama made about the fact that this is the first time in her adult life that she has been proud to be an American.
The country needs to hear this from the Black perspective. Long before I was born, my grandfather Joseph Burleson, owned a considerable amount of land in oil rich Texas .
Because during that era, Blacks could not vote, nor could they contest anything in the courts of the United States ,
my grandfather's land was STOLEN by his White neighbor. My grandfather, who was literate and better educated
than my grandmother, drove to town.
Seeing my grandfather leave, the covetous neighbor asked my grandmother to show him the deed to the property.
He snatched it. She could no t insist that he give it back, nor could she have reported this THEFT to the sheriff because of the fact that Blacks had no rights in the 1800's. The prevailing law at that time was he who held the deed owned the land. Do you think that is something that I am PROUD OF? Right now I should be living off the oil and gas royalties.
In 1934 when my dad drove us to Texas to meet his family, when he stopped to purchase gasoline, his daughters and wife were not allowed to use the washroom. As a man it was easier for him to relieve himself in the bushes, but not for the females. We were, however, reduced to having to go in the bushes, also. Do you think I am PROUD OF THAT?
In 1938 when my oldest sister went to enroll in Hyde Park High School, she was told by the counselor that she did not want to take college preparatory courses, she wanted to study domestic science. Do you think I'm PROUD OF THAT?
When in 1943 my parents attempted to buy the 2 flat at 5338 South Kenwood, where we had lived since 1933,
in Hyde Park, Chicago , IL we were told that we could not buy it because there was a restrictive covenant that said that the property was never to be sold to "Negroes." Do you think I am PROUD OF THAT?
In 1950 when I graduated from college, I was unable to get a job because I was considered "overqualified." the code word for they would not hire me because of my race. All of the want ads called for Japanese Americans or Neisis (the word given to Japanese Americans at that time). Do you think that was something that I should have been PROUD OF?
My cousin's barbershop was bombed in Mississippi in the 50's because he was encouraging Black people to register to vote. His wife who had earned a Masters Degree from Northwestern University lost her position as the principal of the local school because of the voter registration activities. Is that something I should be PROUD OF?
As Senator Obama has previously stated, we have entered the silly season.
Barack Obama is a very rare individual, the likes of whom the world seldom sees. Like most geniuses, they are often misunderstood. They are objects of envy and jealousy. They are suspect because they soar above the average man who does not have the intellectual ability to understand the greatness of special people. They are also targets to be pulled down to the level of the mediocre who cannot stand to see an individual with deep convictions and high standards.
A true Christian loves his fellow man unconditionally.
A true Christian wants the best and tries to bring out the best in his fellow man.
A true Christian wants to unite and bring the world together in peace and harmony.
This is what Senator Obama stands for; but, unfortunately, he has had to get off point to answer these false charges, innuendoes, and just plain lies. We are in the presence of an angel unaware in Senator Barack Obama, and this country needs him, more than he needs us. He is the only person at this time in history who can restore respect for America with the worlds' people. Because of his family background, the influence of his beloved mother who instilled great values in him, the influence of his absent father who vicariously inspired a son to go to Harvard.
Like, Michelle Obama, after living in this country all of my 78 years, loving my country and not understanding why my country has not loved me, I now for the first time in my adult life feel PROUD OF MY COUNTRY because I sense a maturing, a recognition of talent and character, and not color, and a field of candidates aspiring to lead this nation coming from very diverse backgrounds of gender, religious beliefs, national origin, ethnicity, age and experiences.
This to me is the HOPE that America is coming into her own and will begin to CHANGE and will embrace the philosophy upon which this country was founded, where all men are created equal and are entitled to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.
Now I truly believe, YES WE CAN!
Why America Can't Get Beyond Race
Obama's speech on race made me think back to what I was doing five years ago. Archbishop Desmond Tutu was a visiting professor at the University of North Florida, and offered a class to non-students which I was lucky enough to attend.
It was the eve of war, and all his comments were filtered through that certainty. We had some slight hope that Bush would back down, that the U.N. might somehow stop him, but we knew what was most likely coming.
But that's another subject. The class was on Tutu's Truth and Reconciliation Commission, which helped South Africa end apartheid without massive spilling of white blood, an alternative most South African whites never thought possible. The Truth and Reconciliation process involved first confronting what took place, allowing victims to speak their truth and requiring oppressors to hear it, arriving at punishments that acknowledge no one is beyond God's ability to redeem, and reparations that restore dignity and compensate for loss on the part of those who were mistreated.
American blacks and whites, who filled the room, listened to this description and avoided eye contact with people in the next seat. They wondered why race is just under the surface of everything in this country, and how this continues to be the case when slavery and reconstruction are so long past. Someone finally found the nerve to ask Tutu why things are different here.
"In South Africa, we knew they intended to clobber us, and you had to deal with that and find ways to defend yourself and to survive. Here, there seemed to be a kind of conspiracy. And I have come to the conclusion that it seems to me that you are not going to be able to have normal relationships until you come to terms with the legacy of slavery and what happened to Native Americans. There seems to be a pain that is sitting in the pit of the tummy of almost all African Americans and Native Americans," Tutu said.
No, we haven't come to terms with it. Like Obama said in his speech, white people today, who never personally owned another person, can't understand why they should be held responsible for what was done in the past. And black people can't understand why we don't get their anger.
Obama's speech, even with all the attention it got, is underestimated because what people really wanted to hear was whether he denounced his pastor enough. They regarded everything else as just a backdrop for his anticipated but not delivered "apology." Instead, he gave us nothing less than the whole shooting match, folks.
The fact is that the comments that have been made and the issues that have surfaced over the last few weeks reflect the complexities of race in this country that we've never really worked through -- a part of our union that we have yet to perfect. And if we walk away now, if we simply retreat into our respective corners, we will never be able to come together and solve challenges like health care, or education, or the need to find good jobs for every American.
Understanding this reality requires a reminder of how we arrived at this point. As William Faulkner once wrote, "The past isn't dead and buried. In fact, it isn't even past."
We need this guy. This country is stuck, and it's going to stay that way until we do what Tutu and Obama urge. As long as we continue to say racism doesn't exist, or that it only exists in the South, or only in that person or this one but never in us, we will remain mired in blame and anger. Let's get beyond it. Let's do the hard work. Let's put Obama in the White House and see where it leads. I'm betting it's somewhere much better than where we are now.
AlterNet is a nonprofit organization and does not make political endorsements. The opinions expressed by its writers are their own. Trish is a regular blogger for the Pensito Review.
|
|
A CUP OF HOT CHOCOLATE
A group of graduates, well established in their
careers, were talking at a reunion and decided to go
visit their old university professor, now retired.
During their visit, the conversation turned to
complaints about stress in their work and lives.
Offering his guests hot chocolate, the professor went
into the kitchen and returned with a large pot of hot
chocolate and an assortment of cups - porcelain,
glass, crystal, some plain looking, some expensive,
some exquisite - telling them to help themselves to
the hot chocolate.
When they all had a cup of hot chocolate in hand, the
professor said: 'Notice that all the nice looking,
expensive cups were taken, leaving behind the plain
and cheap ones. While it is normal for you to want
only the best for yourselves, that is the source of
your problems and stress. The cup that you're
drinking from adds nothing to the quality of the hot chocolate.
In most cases it is just more expensive and in some
cases even hides what we drink. What all of you
really wanted was hot chocolate, not the cup; but you
consciously went for the best cups... And then you
began eyeing each other's cups.
Now consider this: Life is the hot chocolate; your
job, money and position in society are the cups. They
are just tools to hold and contain life. The cup you
have does not define, nor change the quality of life
you have. Some times, by concentrating only on the
cup, we fail to enjoy the hot chocolate God has
provided us.
God makes the hot chocolate, man chooses the cups.
The happiest people don't have the best of everything.
They just make the best of everything that they have.
Enjoy your hot chocolate in 2008!!!
|
| Subject: BET Honors Spark Protest
January 12, 2008 - (Washington, DC)
Just as BET was honoring the best and brightest in education, business, and entertianment, protestors paraded outside of the Warner Theatre.
Braving windy, but bearable temperatures, hundreds of protestors walked up and down 14th Street in single film formation carrying signs that said "BET does not depict me", and "I am not a thug".
http://dculs.com/bethonors.html
|
THE FIGHT FOR FREEDOM
The fight for freedom
was for civil rights,
for peaceful days
and quiet nights.
Men stood strong
against mainstream strife,
knowing full well
it could cost them their life.
All that was wanted
was a chance to be,
alive in a land
that was truly free.
Thank you Lord
for their steadfast stand,
now change has occurred
across our great land.
From the fight for freedom
what did we gain,
the right to act
as though we are insane?
We glorify things
with a negative side,
live our lives open
with nothing to hide.
It’s now “keeping it real”
and “I need to get paid,”
be true to the game
or you will get played. |
No respect for our women
we treat them like dirt,
our hatred for them
can be found on a shirt
We now quote from rappers
with the craziest name,
like Ghostface and Soulja Boy
and 50 and Game.
It’s just a big hustle
that no one can win,
words filled with hatred
living in sin.
I guess what I really
am trying to say,
is a new fight for freedom
is needed today.
We must fight against lyrics
of songs that are sung,
that poison the minds
of our future, our young.
We must up-lift our women
and fill them with pride,
let them know they are special
let them feel good inside.
We must teach our young men
that we’ll never be free,
til they live out the quest
of Dr. King’s legacy. |
Terrell C. Flucas
|
A FREEDOM FIGHTER’S PRAYER
Legs that are weary from marching all day,
clothes that are wet from the fireman’s spray.
A headache so bad it reacts to all sound,
a smile on a face as I’m thrown to the ground.
Spit on and cursed at they yell with a wail,
a night in a cell there will be no bail.
This is my struggle somehow I’ll get through,
I believe in this cause it’s the right thing to do.
Lord all that I ask at the end of this fight,
is that those in the future never lose sight.
Of the price that was paid not so long ago,
Lord let the remember Lord let them all know.
I withstood the abuse I stood strong against strife,
I fought on to my death so they could have a free life.
Terrell C. Flucas

Voting Should Not
Require a Photo ID
Monday , December 24,
2007
By Martin Frost
Once upon a time, in the dark
ages of American politics, white Southerners
conspired to prevent blacks from voting by
passing a series of restrictive voter
registration laws that included such things as
poll taxes and literacy tests. These practices
were outlawed by Congress with passage of the
Voting Rights Act of 1965.
The lineal descendents of the people who tried
to restrict black suffrage are back. Their new
tactic is to require a picture ID to be shown
by anyone seeking to vote. An Indiana law
imposing such a requirement has been
challenged, and its fate will be decided by
the U.S. Supreme Court in a case set for
argument early next year. Challenging the
adoption of this and other voter photo ID laws
is the single biggest civil rights issue
facing the country today.
Let's take a close look at the Indiana law
passed on a straight party line vote by the
state's Republican legislature and signed
into law by its Republican governor.
The Indiana law requires that a prospective
voter show a current photo ID that has been
issued by the United States or by the State of
Indiana. It must have an expiration date, and
the name on the document must conform "to
the name in the individual's voter
registration record."
This sounds reasonable on its face. Not so.
This law in fact discriminates against people
who do not drive and do not otherwise need a
state-issued photo ID. Who are we talking
about? Elderly, disabled, poor and minority
voters, to be specific. Most of these
coincidentally are Democrats.
According to the brief submitted to the
Supreme Court by the individuals challenging
the constitutionality of this Indiana law, the
statute clearly is aimed straight at these
groups. The brief notes that "About 12% of
voting-age Americans lack a driver's
license. And about 11% of voting-age United
States citizens -- more than 21 million
individuals -- lack any form of current
government-issued photo ID. That 11% figure
grows to 15% for voting-age citizens earning
less than $35,000 per year, 18% for citizens
at least 65 years old, and 25% for
African-American voting-age citizens." This
is what is called in the law a "disparate
effect."
What's the other side of the argument? An
amicus brief filed with the Supreme Court on
behalf of a group of Indiana and Southern
state election officials notes, "Political
power is, unfortunately, a proven inducement
to corruption. As James Madison noted in
Federalist 51, men are not angels and sound
government must be structured in light of that
unfortunate, but realistic,
understanding." Madison, of course,
helped draft our Constitution, which counted
slaves as three-fifths of a person for census
purposes. The government-sanctioned racial
discrimination of our founding fathers took a
civil war and almost 200 years to reverse.
The peculiar nature of all this is that no one
can cite examples of in-person voter fraud,
which is what a photo ID theoretically is
designed to prevent. The only examples of
voter fraud ever cited involve absentee
ballots where no photo ID would be necessary.
Trying to impose a photo ID requirement as a
condition to vote is a step backward. It is an
effort that will suppress the vote of
minorities and the elderly. It has been
vigorously opposed by all the civil rights
organizations in the country and by
fair-minded people of both parties.
We should be doing everything possible to make
it easier for eligible persons to vote in this
country, rather than making it more difficult.
The United States has one of the lowest
percentages of voter participation rates in
the world. Every time we erect barriers to
casting votes, we erode our image as a great
bastion of democracy.
There is no question that anyone involved in
voter fraud should be prosecuted. But you
don't eliminate voter fraud by making it
harder for honest people to cast their votes.
There are plenty of other ways to ensure that
the person who shows up to vote is the person
on the registration rolls and not someone
else. Establishing a system that discriminates
against low income, elderly and minority
voters is not a reasonable response to this
particular problem.
Many middle class and wealthy white people
can't understand why someone would not have
a current photo ID. These are the same people
who didn't understand why poor blacks and
the elderly weren't able to get out of New
Orleans before Katrina hit. It was because
many of these unfortunate victims of the storm
didn't have a car and, of course, also
didn't need a driver's license with a photo
ID.
This is not the bad old days when the
government tacitly or explicitly excluded
blacks and others from the polls. Let's hope
the Supreme Court doesn't take a big step
back in time.
Martin Frost
served in Congress from 1979 to 2005,
representing a diverse district in the
Dallas-Ft. Worth area. He served two terms as
chairman of the House Democratic Caucus, the
third-ranking leadership position for House
Democrats, and two terms as chairman of the
Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee.
Frost serves as a regular contributor to FOX
News Channel and is a partner at the law firm
of Polsinelli, Shalton, Flanigan and Suelthaus.
He holds a Bachelor of Journalism degree from
the University of Missouri and a law degree
from the Georgetown Law Center.
|
|
Stone
Two friends were walking
through the desert
During some point of the journey, they had an
argument;
And one friend slapped the other one in the
face
The one who got slapped
was hurt, but
Without saying anything, wrote in the sand
Today my best friend slapped me in the face
They kept on walking
until they found an oasis
Where they decided to take a bath
The one who got slapped got stuck in the mire
and started drowning
But the friend saved him
After he recovered from the near drowning,
He wrote on a stone: "Today my best friend
saved my life"
The friend who had slapped and saved his best
friend asked him
"After I hurt you, you wrote in the sand and
now,
You write on a stone. Why?"
The friend replied
"When someone hurts us
We should write it down in sand, where
The winds of forgiveness can erase it away
But, when someone does
something good for us,
We must engrave it in stone
Where no wind can ever erase it."
Learn to write your hurts
in sand
And to carve your benefits in stone
They say it takes a
minute to find a special person,
An hour to appreciate them,
A day to love them,
But then an entire life to forget them
Take the time to LIVE!
Do not value the things
you have in Life,
But value who you have in your Life!
Friend For Life,
James Short
--
God, give us faith to trust your good intent
for your world and courage to act to make
those intentions a reality.
|
|
Did You
Know...?
I bet you
didn't know that... (at least not all of the
'facts' below)
Alaska
More than half of the coastline of the entire
United
States is in Alaska.
Amazon
The Amazon rainforest produces more than 20%
the
world's oxygen supply. The Amazon River pushes
so much
water into the Atlantic Ocean that, more
than one
hundred miles at sea off the mouth of the
river,
one can dip fresh water out of the ocean.
The volume of water in the Amazon river is greater
than the next eight larg est rivers in the
world combined and three times the flow of all
rivers
in the United States.
Antarctica
Antarctica is the only land on our planet that
is not
owned by any country. Ninety percent of the
world's
ice covers Antarctica. This ice also
represents
seventy percent of all the fresh water in the
world.
As strange as it sounds, however, Antarctica
is
essentially a desert. The average yearly total
precipitation is about two inches.
Although
covered with ice (all but 0.4 % of it,
i.e.), Antarctica
is the driest place on the planet, with
an absolute
humidity lower than the Gobi desert.
Brazil
Brazil got its name from the nut, not the
other way
around.
Canada
Canada has more lakes than the rest of the
world
combined. Canada is an Indian word meaning
"Big
Village."
Chicago
Next to Warsaw, Chicago has the largest Polish
population in the world.
Detroit
Woodward Avenue in Detroit, Michigan, carries
the
designation M-1, named so because it was the f
irst
paved road anywhere.
Damascus, Syria
Damascus, Syria, was flourishing a couple of
thousand
years before Rome was founded in 753 BC,
making it the
oldest continuously inhabited city in
existence.
Istanbul, Turkey
Istanbul, Turkey, is the only city in the
world
located on two continents.
Los Angeles
Los Angeles's full name is El Pueblo de
Nuestra
Senora la Reina de los Angeles de Porciuncula
--and
can be abbreviated to 3.63% of its size: L.A.
New York City
The term "The Big Apple" was coined
by touring jazz
musicians of the 1930's who used the slang
expression
"apple" for any town or city.
Therefore, to play New York
City is to play the big time - The Big
Apple. There are more
Irish in New York City than in Dublin,
Ireland; more Italians in
New York City than in Rome, Italy;
and more Jews in New
York City than in Tel Aviv, Israel.
Ohio
There are no natural lakes in the state of
Ohio, every
one is manmade.
Pitcairn Island
The smallest islan d with country status is
Pitcairn
in Polynesia, at just 1.75 sq. miles/4,53 sq.
km.
Rome
The first city to reach a population of 1
million
people was Rome, Italy in 133 B.C. There is a
city
called Rome on every continent.
Siberia
Siberia contains more than 25% of the world's
forests.
S.M.O.M.
The actual smallest sovereign entity in the
world is
the Sovereign Military Order of Malta (S.M.O.M.).
It
is located in the city of Rome, Italy, has
an area
of two tennis courts, and as of 2001 has
a population ;of 80, 20 less people than the
Vatican. It is a sovereign entity under
international law, just as the Vatican
is.
Sahara Desert
In the Sahara Desert, there is a town named
Tidikelt,
which did not receive a drop of rain for ten
years.
Technically though, the driest place onEarth
is in the
valleys of the Antarctic near Ross Island.
There has
been no rainfall there for two million years.
Spain
Spain literally means 'the land of rabbits.'
St. Paul, Minnesota
St. Paul , Minnesota, was originally called
Pig's Eye
after a man named Pierre "Pig's Eye"
Parrant who set
up the first business there.
Roads
Chances that a road is unpaved in the U.S.A.:
1%, in
Canada: 75%
Texas
The deepest hole ever made in the world is in
Texas.
It is as deep as 20 empire state buildings but
only 3
inches wide.
United States
The Eisenhower interstate system requires that
one-mile in every five must be straight. These
straight sections are usable as airstrips in
times of
war or other emergencies.
Waterfalls
The water of Angel Falls (the World's highest)
in
Venezuela drops 3,212 feet (979 meters). They
are 15
times higher than Niagara Falls.
So, didn't it feel good to learn something new
today???
I have always said you should learn something
new
every day. Unfortunately, most of us are at
that age
where what we learn today, we forget tomorrow.
But, give it a shot anyway! ...
|
Being Black in
the Work Place
They take my kindness for weakness.
They take my silence for speechlessness.
They consider my uniqueness strange.
They call my language slang.
They see my confidence as conceit.
They see my mistakes as defeat.
They consider my success accidental.
They minimize my intelligence to
"potential".
My questions mean "I'm unaware".
My advancement is somehow unfair.
Any praise is preferential treatment.
To voice concern is discontentment.
If I stand up for myself, I'm too defensive.
If I don't trust them, I'm too apprehensive.
I'm defiant if I separate.
I'm fake if I assimilate.
Yet I'm constantly faced with workplace hate.
My character is constantly under attack.
Pride for my race makes me, "TOO
BLACK".
Yet, I can only be me. And who am I you might
ask?
I am that Strong Black Person
Who stands on the backs of my ancestor's
achievements, with an erect spine pointing to
the stars with pride, dignity and respect ...
who lets the workplace in America know
That I not only possess the ability to play by
the rules, but I can
Make them as well! Black History 365
|
|
The
Black Eagle And The Chicken
Once there was this chicken farmer who had a
barnyard of white leghorn chickens. Hard times
befell the farmer, and the chicken business
wasn't doing too well. A friend of the farmer
came to him one day and said, "I have an
idea how you can make yourself some extra
money."
Of course, the farmer was all ears. The friend
went on and said, "Up there in the
mountains I spied a black eagle last week.
Now, if you set a trap for her and capture
her, you can bring her down, show her off, and
charge admission to see her."
The farmer thought that was a good idea. So he
built a big trap, went up in the mountain, and
finally caught the black eagle. He brought her
down and tried to transfer her from the trap
to a big viewing cage he had built. But the
black eagle was too used to freedom, so she
bit him, she clawed him, she fought him every
time he tried to get near the trap. The farmer
became so angry he got his gun and killed the
poor black eagle who only wanted her freedom.
The friend came again, saw what had happened,
and said, "Look, brother farmer. I
believe that black eagle laid a couple of
eggs. Go get those eggs of hers, bring them
down, and put them under one of your setting
hens. Then, when the eggs hatch, those little
eaglets won't know who they are. They will
think they are chickens, so they won't fight
back and bite you. They won't claw you. They
will be peaceful and calm because they won't
know who they are. Then you can show them off
in that big viewing cage, charge admission to
see them, and make yourself a whole lot of
money."
The farmer got the eagle eggs and put them
under one of his setting hens. In time, one of
the eggs hatched, and a little eaglet came
out. He didn't know who he was. He thought he
was a chicken. The farmer was happy. When he
went near the little eaglet, the eaglet got
frightened and ran away as fast as his little
legs would carry him. The farmer called him
"Tom".
Tom ran around with the chickens and was very
happy until one day he saw himself in the
stream of water that ran through the barnyard.
He saw he was not white like the chickens. He
saw the feathers on his head did not lie down
slick like the feathers on chickens' heads. He
became so ashamed of his color and his head
feathers. He took some cream and rubbed it
over his feathers to lighten them up. Then he
put some on his head feathers to make them lie
down. Now Tom felt happy that he was beginning
to look more like a chicken.
By and by the other egg hatched. Now this
eaglet broke bad when he came on the set.
Somehow he got the nerve to stand his ground
when the farmer stamped his foot. The farmer
called him Turk. The other eagle, Tom, began
coming over to give advice to Turk.
"Here's some cream to put on those
feathers so you can lighten them like mine and
the rest of our brother chickens. Then do
something about that head. Do something."
When Turk refused and shied away, Tom whipped
out a silk cloth. "Well, at least put
this silk rag on your head to do something to
those feathers up there."
But Turk said, "I kinda like my color and
my head feathers the way they are, thank
you."
Tom turned away in disgust, and happily joined
the other chickens in play, leaving poor Turk
all by himself.
The only joy for poor, little, lonely Turk was
in looking up at the sky for long periods of
time, because somehow he felt that was where
he belonged.
One morning while he was looking up in the
sky, a speck appeared. The speck got larger
and larger until it became the largest bird he
had ever seen. You and I know it must have
been a Black Eagle. Well, the black eagle saw
little Turk on the ground and came in on a
branch overhanging the barnyard. The eagle
looked down at Turk and said with a deep an
strong voice, "What are you doing down
there with those chickens?"
"Why, I am a chicken," replied Turk.
The old black eagle laughed, and said
"You're no chicken."
"Then what am I?" asked Turk.
"You're Black Eagle."
"An eagle?" asked Turk. "What's
an eagle?"
"An eagle," bellowed the old eagle,
"is the ruler of the skies. Spread your
wings and come up here on the branch so I can
tell you who you are."
But poor little Turk, with tears in his eyes,
said "I can't. You know chickens can't
fly that high."
The old eagle became very angry at Turk.
"I told you that you are not a chicken.
You're an eagle. Now spread those wings."
Turk spread his wings out, as far as he could
spread them.
"Now flap them," said the old eagle.
Turk began flapping them, faster and faster,
and to his surprise he rose higher and higher
- higher than he had ever risen in his life -
and came in on the branch beside the old
eagle.
"Now settle down," said the old
eagle, "and I will tell you who you are.
I will tell you your history. Your father, as
a black eagles are, was king of the skies. No
bird was as strong. No bird could fly as high
or as far as your father without rest. And
your mother, as queen of the skies, ruled the
skies alongside your father. And you are their
son."
"But, but, but what about my color?"
asked Turk. "You see, the chickens are
white, and I am black."
"Don't you know what that color
represents?" asked the old eagle,
"It represents royalty."
"That's heavy," cried Turk.
"But what about the way the feathers are
on my head?"
"That's your crown. I told you, you are a
king."
"That's deep," said the young eagle.
"Let's tell Tom." Spying Tom on the
ground with the chickens, Turk called down,
"Tom, Tom! This eagle up here is telling
us about our history. It's so beautiful."
But Tom shouted back, "I don't want to
learn anything about our history, I'm too busy
getting these crumbs off the ground. Anyway,
you better come down out of that tree before
you get us all in trouble."
The old eagle shook his head sadly.
"Come, let us fly away to our
destiny."
They took off. Pretty soon they flew over a
deep valley. The young eagle was frightened.
"We'll fall."
But the old eagle smiled and said, "Don't
be afraid. You won't fall. This is the Valley
of Oppression. You will fly safely over the
valley because you have the strength of kings
in your wings. Fly on!" And they flew
safely over the valley.
They came to a big desert. Again, the young
eagle was afraid. "I don't see any trees
on which to rest." But the old eagle
said, "This is the Desert of Mediocrity -
the Desert of Don't Care - the Desert of Only
a C Average. But you don't need to rest. You
will fly safely over the desert because you
have the strength of queens in your wings. Fly
on!" And they flew safely over the Desert
of Mediocrity.
But straight in front of them loomed a high
mountain. Young Turk then asked, "Will we
crash into the mountain?"
The old eagle smiled. "No we won't crash.
This is the Mountain of Injustice that we will
fly safely over because we have the strength
of the ancestors in our wings. Fly on!"
And both Black Eagles, young and old, flew
over the mountain.
Fly on Black Eagle, Fly on!
Author unknown,
ON ECONOMIC VIOLENCE
 |
<<Printer-friendly
version of this article. |
Have you ever received money from a Chinese person for anything other
than them making change for you? No, is the answer I have been receiving
when asking this question as part of an informal survey to Black People.
The follow up question is, "Have you ever given money to a Chinese person?"
The answer invariably is yes. This imbalance of give and take is reflective
of the consciousness of Black people and consequently our relationship with
ourselves and others.
There is a reason why every Black Ghetto has a Chinese food restaurant, but
there are no Soul Food restaurants in Chinatown. In fact, the most popular
Soul Food restaurant in Harlem, New York on 135th Street and Malcolm X
Boulevard is owned and operated by a Chinese family.
Again, there are no Soul Food restaurants in Chinatown and there certainly
is no Chinese Food restaurant in China town owned and operated by a
Black family. If a Black person tried, the business would be shut down,
before it started. Why? Economic Violence.
Every group of people understands practices and strategically utilizes the
concept of economic violence, except Black people. In fact the economic
violence that we, as Black people, practice is economic violence against
ourselves. Economic violence is the art and science of using the exchange
of money for goods and/or services as an aspect of ethnic warfare, survival
and prosperity.
The Chinese will not support a Black business over their own, because they
are not interested in ethnic suicide. The Chinese are logical, as self
preservation is the most basic of human instincts. So not only will a
Chinese person not support a Black business over a Chinese business, they
take it one step further and plant their business in a Black community and
implement plans to take Black people's money. This ideological posture is
pure and scientific economic violence. Replace Chinese with any other
ethnic group besides Black, and the picture becomes clearer.
The above is not a condemnation of Chinese, Korean, Arab or white businesses
at all. It is a condemnation of Black people who have forgotten The Honorable
Marcus Garvey's mantra of "Race First." Every ethnic group has mastered
this concept except Black people. It is in my interest to come from a powerful
people. Therefore, my interest is committing economic violence on behalf of
Black people. That means purchasing a Black person's service or product
"first" before I purchase any other ethnic group or race's service or product.
Have you committed economic violence on your behalf or against yourself today?
If you are a Black person reading this, I am sure that you are familiar with the
notion of, "I just want the best product or service for my money and a lot of
times, Black folks just aren't up to par."
My response is,
1) If that's your attitudinal posture, then do not get mad if
people don't patronize your Black business (product or service) for fear of
deficiencies.
2) Since when has the uncleanliness of a Chinese food restaurant stopped you
from buying a to-go order of shrimp fried rice, or the messiness of an Arab or
Indian corner-store, gas station or bodega stopped you from purchasing those
pork rinds you love and a soft drink. Have you committed economic violence
on your behalf or against yourself today?
Black people: Due to our lack of economic militarism, we are losing the fight
for economic independence. That's why everyone, and I mean everyone, "bangs"
on Black people. All ethnic groups gain their financial strength in America by
economically banging on Black people. This is how white people became
wealthy in this world.
The European transatlantic slave trade of kidnapping millions of Africans as
Prisoners of War was the biggest gang bang of all time. Chattel and plantation
slavery was a continuation of this policy of economic violence. Since then, we
have been left open to economic attack by every ethnic group that makes it to
America. Nothing has really changed, because the relationship between slave
and slave-master is still the same. *Tastes, Interests and Values: Stop Eating
Pizza,*You're not Italian The first step in perpetuating economic violence
against a people is to change their tastes, interests and values to the tastes,
interests and values of the invading culture. Tastes, interests and values are
the sole determinative factors in the decision to purchase a service or product.
This is extremely important as all products and services spring from a cultural
landscape. Here are some extremely basic examples to illustrate my point:
(1) An overwhelming amount of people in America, purchase turkey on the third
week of November, every single year. The turkey is an imperative for a Thanks-
giving dinner. Thanksgiving is a white cultural holiday designed to celebrate
white conquest and genocide of the native American population, but is masked
as a day of family togetherness and thanks. The people who own turkey farms
are white poultry farmers. They are the direct economic beneficiaries of the
values of this particular cultural holiday. If native American and Black people
were the owners of turkey farms, you can bet your last dollar that turkey would
not be a requirement of that holiday. White people understand economic
violence and under no circumstance would they allow anyone other than
whites to benefit from a white holiday.
(2) This is the same reason why U.S. federal, state and municipal government
cars must be American cars.They understand economic violence. Have you
committed economic violence on your behalf or against yourself today?
(3) Selling beef to Hindus won't work. The Hindu religion absolutely forbids the
killing of cows as the cow is sacred to them. Therefore selling beef products
to this crowd is not economically feasible. However, if you are able to convert
the Hindus away from their religion into say, Christianity, you would have not
just brought a new group of people to the priest or the pastor on Sunday, but
a new group of people to McDonald's and Burger King, because their tastes,
interests and values concerning cows would have changed.
A further examination of tastes, interests and values reveal that once you adopt
or are coerced into perpetuating the tastes, interests and values of another
group of people you will not only be committing economic violence against
yourself but you will be committing violence against your health.
*Example 1: In Hawaii*, over 50 percent of native adults 40 years old or more
were diagnosed with diabetes. The Hawaiians are a Polynesian people who have
for centuries flourished on a local diet of vegetables and fruits from their
land. After the U.S. invasion and displacement of the Hawaiian Queen
Liliuokalani,
the tastes, values and interests of native Hawaiians were changed to the tastes
of white people. Hawaiians began eating Hamburgers, Pizza, etc. and became
zombies of American fast foodism and forgot about their traditional foods.
Something interesting happened: Disease in the form of Diabetes. Diabetes was
never a problem for Hawaiians until their tastes we re changed. In effect,
Hawaiians were funding their Diabetes. A Hawaiian doctor trained in western
medicine and traditional healing sciences went on a crusade to save her people
from Diabetes. She did not prescribe insulin-controlled by white pharmaceutical
companies, which is a band-aid to the real problem, but she prescribed a
traditional Hawaiian diet and forbade her patients to eat European made food. As her
patients ate green leaves, fruits and root food vegetables from the place where they
evolved, their diabetes was wiped out completely. Additionally, in this manner, Hawaiian
farmers benefit from the purchase of food grown on their own land, thereby
restoring economic and physical health-simultaneously.
*Example 2: I was at a supermarket in Miami,*Florida buying a yam. Not a sweet
potato, but a real yam, brown and hard. The cashier was Black and said, "What's
that, a turnip?" I was startled and had a serious epiphany. Black people have
been so oppressed in America, that we do not even recognize our own ancestral
foods. The implications again are self inflicted economic and physical violence
(dis-ease).
* A major disease that affects Black Americans is Sickle Cell Anemia*.
However, this disease does not affect Black people in Africa nearly as much.
The reason: The shifting of tastes, interests, and values much like the Hawaiian
example. The sickle cell trait is a trait that helps Africans fight off malaria.
The sickling of the red blood cell helps prevent the malaria parasite from binding
to the cell due to the peculiar shape of a sickled cell and its hemoglobin. Since
Black Americans are literally from West Africa, they have this trait just like
any other West African. The difference is the West African diet contains root foods
from the Africans soil like cassava and yam. Studies by Nigerian researcher,
Dr. Ogi Agbaihave, shown that thiocyanate in cassava and yam and their leaves
alleviate the symptoms of Sickle Cell Anemia. Black Americans do not eat
cassava or true yams, so Sickle Cell Anemia is rampant. Instead, Black
Americans have been forced to develop a taste for everything, other than
African root food, therefore the disease is present. Disease is defined as
imbalance. When a person or a people have tastes, interests and values
outside of who they really are, all types of imbalances occur such as
economic and physical health imbalances. Recalibrating a Black American
diet from chitlins and fried chicken back to a West African diet of plantains,
cassava, yams, etc., will create a necessary economic balance by supporting
African commodities markets and enriching personal, group economic and
physical health simultaneously. Have you committed economic violence today?
**The Opium Wars: There is Nothing You Have That We Want** China** In
studying economic violence, tastes interests and values, a cursory discussion
on the Opium Wars is extremely important.
Please note that major wars occur due to the addictions of
Europeans.Today,
there is a war in Iraq, due to the European addiction to oil. In the 19th
century, the Opium wars between Britain and China were due to the British addiction to
tea. The Chinese have an ancient tradition of drinking tea as part of their
daily ritual. The British developed this custom due to the travels of many European
"explorers" who successfully made it over to Asia. By the 19th century, tea
became a staple of the British, particularly the middle class and ruling class.
The British imported all of their tea from China. In a short amount of time,
there was a huge trade imbalance between Britain and China in favor of China. The
British paid China for their tea with gold. Soon, the British became nervous as
their gold reserves were being depleted. However, the British population's taste
for tea was insatiable and there would have been riots if the British population
was deprived of their tea. In response to the economic violence that Britain
was suffering at the hands of China, British leaders arranged a meeting with
Chinese leaders.
The British wanted to stop trading tea for gold. They told the Chinese that they
would trade anything else that Britain produced for the Chinese tea.
The Chinese response was laughter as the Chinese retorted, There is nothing
that you have that we want." The British were stunned as they took this as an
offense to their way of life and their plans to keep their gold.
The British went back to Britain and decided to pump opium into China.The opium
was to be traded for gold in China, and thereby getting the gold back into
British hands. In addition, the British took lands from the Indian subcontinent for two
purposes:
1) for growing the poppy plant for opium to facilitate their drug trade and
2) for growing various other plants for tea so that trading tea with China would be
obsolete. In fact, today one of the most famous tea names is Ceylon tea. Ceylon is
the former British colonial name for the country in the Indian sub-continent
now named Sri Lanka.
One day, in 1839, the Chinese seized a ship off of its shores containing tons
of opium. The Chinese rightfully seized the ship as opium was illegal in China
and anyone caught with opium was given the death penalty. The British
declared the Chinese seizure of their ship as an act of war, and hence the
initiation of the Opium wars which were from 1839-1842 and 1856-1860
between Britain and China.
The Chinese have never forgotten the economic war with Europeans and
the implications are felt today. Consequently, the Chinese have nuclear
weapons, the largest standing army in the world and Europe and America
as debtors in trade. Their major strength has been maintaining their own tastes,
interests and values and the ability to look at Europeans in the face and say,
"There is nothing that you have that we want." Black people, can we say
the same? The reason why we have been in trouble as a race for so long
is our unrelenting taste for things European.
Remember, African prisoners of war (slaves) were traded for white
commod-
ities like European processed rum, spare parts and European textiles. Have
you committed economic violence today?
**Slavery and the Value of Labor: Adam Smith* *Adam Smith was an economic
philosopher from England and considered the patron saint of European Capitalist
thought. He was also an opponent of the enslavement of Africans in America
and Europe. However, he was not opposed to our enslavement for moral or
noble reasons. He was opposed to slavery because he thought it was
inefficient in the capitalist world. He believed Africans should be paid for
our labor so that we could buy European goods. That was his sole
argument. He didn't like the idea that such a large population could not
be consumers because slaves were not allowed the ability to earn money.
What does this mean? It means that the only reason why it was acceptable
for you and I to not be enslaved is so that we could feed the economic
system of white supremacy better and more efficiently. And what are Black
people now? The biggest one-dimensional pure consumers the world has
ever seen.
The slavery relationship is still the same. If you work a job that pays you
ten dollars per hour and you pay $150.00 to Tommy Hilfiger for his jeans,
you have effectively given 15 hours of your labor to Tommy
Hilfiger.
You worked 15 hours for him. When are you going to work for yourself
and your people, by purchasing Black goods and services with your
labor hours? Tommy Hilfiger and company doesn't even have to whip
us anymore to turn over our labor to him. He is still economically
violent, and we are still bleeding.
Lesson: In your economic life, if you are not buying from your own
people first, then you are committing suicide on many levels and
enlisting for slavery and zombification. Buy Black with no apology
and if you have to buy from others, try to make sure it's a bootleg.
*Never pay full price for anything from others-especially those who
have historically and continue to benefit from your underdevelopment.
For in fact, our relationship is dialectical to our oppressors.
Their development is dependent on our underdevelopment.* Have
you committed economic violence /self-hate today?
No
FEAR Congressional Tribunal 2007
Notification of Federal Employees
Anti-discrimination and Retaliation Act -
5th Anniversary
(No FEAR)
To see
more pictures of the Tribunal, please go to:
Joe
Madison, the co-chair of the No FEAR
Tribunal (along with Congressman Walter
Fauntroy), WOL radio personality and
MSNBC consultant -- is featuring a
whistleblower once a week. His
interviews focus on individuals who
testified at the No FEAR congressional
hearing. Today, he interviewed
Darlene Fitzgerald. She insightfully told
her chilling story about uncovering tons
of narcotics and contraband with the
apparent approval of US Customs
managers. The Coalition, applauds
Darlene for her remarkable courage.
To
access the Joe Madison radio show:
Please
find below an op-ed by Washington
Whistleblower Week co-chair and founder of
Doctors fo Open Government, Dr.Jim Murtagh.
Modern
Day Paul Reveres Ride to Washington
By
James J. Murtagh, M.D.
(James
Murtagh spent 20 years as an Intensive
Care Unit physician. Dr. Murtagh is the
founder of Doctors for Open Government and
is a co-chair of Washington Whistleblower
Week.)
So through the night rode Paul Revere;
And so through the night went his cry of
alarm
To every Middlesex village and farm S
A cry of defiance, and not of fear,
A voice in the darkness, a knock at the
doorS
Paul Revere is America's most well known
whistleblower. Present day patriots who
sound the alarm when danger threatens our
society rightly believe Paul Revere to be
the founding father of whistleblowing.
Like modern day patriots, he called on the
Sons of Liberty to oppose the grave,
immediate dangers posed by redcoat troops
sent to impose the will of an unresponsive
king and parliament.
Last week, a conference as unique as Paul
Revere's ride took place in our nation's
capital. Whistleblower's Week in
Washington (WWW) alerted the countryside
of the grave dangers threatening our
nation's security and well being. Modern
patriots from a broad spectrum of
government and private employers - health,
environment, national security, civil
rights, veterans, and more - have all
banded together in a single meeting. The
program was initiated and organized by the
whistleblowers themselves. They were
joined by more than 50 eminent public
interest organizations in Washington to
sound the alarm on dangers proven too real
to be ignored. Hundreds of citizens took
part.
Whistleblower's Week in Washington
provided the time, place and voice for
whistleblower patriots to band together
for the first time to speak out against
fraud, waste and corruption. These heroes
and heroines represent a broad spectrum of
government and private employees -
national security, veterans, healthcare,
environment, civil rights and justice.
Activities included congressional forums
and hearings, an award ceremony for
Senator Charles Grassley, rallies, and a
film screening and book signings by
eminent whistleblowers. Participants
visited legislative offices to alert
individual members of Congress of grave
concerns.
Speakers and participants included both
well-known figures and unfamiliar but
important whistleblowers such as:
o
Republican Senator Charles Grassley who
was the keynote speaker. He was given a
lifetime achievement award for his fight
against waste, fraud and corruption in
government. The award, like the
conference, is completely bipartisan and
has been endorsed by both blue-chip
conservatives and liberals.
o
Mahatma Gandhi's grandson Dr. Kanubhai R.
Gandhi and EPA whistleblower and civil
rights activist Dr. Marsha Coleman-Adebayo
asked to keep America beautiful and safe
from "Sea to Shining Sea.
o
Religious leaders, including Rev. Walter
E. Fauntroy, stressed the role of speaking
the truth and the role of faith based
initiatives in America's civil rights
heritage.
o
Climate Change Whistleblower Rick Piltz
who suffered numerous retaliations
after reporting that White House officials
with no scientific training tampered with
critical reports.
o
Susan Wood who resigned in protest against
the FDA's delaying of a ruling on whether
the Plan B pill would be made more
accessible to patients. She charged that
then-acting FDA Commissioner Lester
Crawford was interfered in FDA decisions.
o Physicians Dr. Helen Salisbury and Dr.
Larry Poliner who put their careers on the
line to protect quality patient care. Dr.
Janet Chandler battled to protect the
humane treatment of her patients, and
after more than a decade of legal appeals
won a Supreme Court verdict upholding her
stand for integrity in medical decisions
for patient care.
o Coleen Rowley who blew the whistle on
the FBI's negligence preceding the
September 11 terrorist attack. Ms. Rowley
was named as one of Time Magazine's
Person's of the Year, along with
conference supporter and Enron
whistleblower Sherron Watkins.
Patriotic commitment united this band of
whistleblowers who oppose hazardous,
illegal and unsafe conditions, waste,
fraud and abuse. They unite in order to
maintain an open society, and to protect
the rights of U.S. citizens to speak
without reprisal on matters threatening
the general welfare and defense of our
nation.
In true Jeffersonian tradition, America's
truth-tellers invited the press, Congress,
and the American people to take part, to
hear their stories, and to judge for
themselves. Like Paul Revere, they rode to
Washington to be heard throughout the
land. New Sons and Daughters of Liberty
must rise to defend our safety, our
national defense and our honor.
The joint
task force of WWW urges you to write your
congressman, your senator, the media, and
your friends to support the goal of a
safer, freer America.
James J. Murtagh
Jr.
Atlanta GA 30329
404-633-9715
May
20, 2007
It's True Black Owner
Partial Preakness Winner Curlin Named For
Black Slave
By Basn Blackbox

YES
it really happened an African American OWNER
of a Triple Crown Race WINNER
Preakness winner Curlin partially owned by
Shirley Cunningham, Kentucky attorney
Please we know it is ABSURD
we have to get excited that FINALLY
for the first time in Modern History an
African American is the even partial owner of
a horse that has won one of the Major
Horse Races of the Year. On Saturday at the
Preakness. By a nose Curlin upset highly
favored Street Sense.
So our Story is not about
the Preakness or even Curlin. This one
is for you Lexington, Kentucky attorney
Shirley Cunningham. Of course the
question is Who The Heck Is Shirley
Cunningham. That is what we will do for
him and you. Tell you who he is so you will
know.
You can be sure the rest
of the media won't. They will be gushing
over the Upset, and Curlin and the Jockey
and the Trainer and the WHITE
owners. Lucky if Cunningham even gets
his named mentioned at all in the White Media.
Hear that SPIKE
Lee. Forget about getting a few future
fellow Morehouse alumni jobs at ESPN. They
still won't be able to do a story about
Shirley Cunningham. That will take BLACK
media. That is where you should be putting
your Big Bucks Spike not kissing up to
White Sports Media. Begging for a few jobs.
Sorry Mr. Shirley
Cunningham this box is about you but we needed
to send Spike a MESSAGE
Back to you. First of all
Congratulations. Allow us rather than
inventing the "wheel" especially as
we are on deadline to profile you by
quoting a thoughtful article about you ( one
of very few ) that identified you
because of your ownership involvement with
Preakness Champ Curlin. done way back on
May 1st.
AND
GET THIS
The Preakness winner is
not only named for a legendary Kentucky
African American "slave" Charlie
Curlin, Shirley Cunningham is his DIRECT
descendant. Cunningham is Charlie
Curlin's own great grandson !!
HERE
ARE EXCERPTS FROM THE ARTICLE
( written prior to the
Kentucky Derby ) from the Lexington
Herald - Leader by reporter Maryjean
Wall worth reading carefully "
Charlie Curlin of Trigg County was a
slave whose name will live forever if the
horse called Curlin wins the Kentucky
Derby on Saturday. Curlin the horse actually
might wind up the post-time favorite: no
surprise, given Curlin is undefeated going
into a wide open race."
" But the story
behind this intriguing Derby hopeful is
much larger than one colt's perfect record
going into America's greatest horse
race. The story goes back to the decade before
the inaugural 1875 Kentucky Derby. The story
takes us down the road southwest from
Louisville to the border of Tennessee and into
rural, secessionist Trigg County."
"What we know of
Charlie Curlin's story begins in 1864
when the slave signed on with the Union Army
in the United States Colored Troops.
Like many soldiers in Kentucky companies
of the U.S. Colored Troops, Curlin found
himself assigned to Camp Nelson in
Central Kentucky. "
"Charlie Curlin was
truly confused about who he was fighting
for. That's very clear from stories he told
when he got back home," said lawyer
Shirley Cunningham Jr. of Georgetown, the
man who named Curlin, the horse."
" Cunningham is
part-owner of Curlin, the horse. He is
also the great-grandson of Charlie Curlin of
Trigg County. He has heard the Curlin
family stories all his life.
If Curlin wins the Derby,
Cunningham will become the first African
American to own a percentage of a Derby
winner since Dudley Allen of Lexington was
lead partner in the Jacobin Stable that
raced 1891 Derby winner, Kingman."
" It's also
interesting "to have a horse owned
by a great-grandson of a slave that possibly
wins the Derby," said one of
Cunningham's partners in Curlin, lawyer
William Gallion, formerly of Kentucky
and now a resident of Captiva, Fla."
" But just as
compelling will be the story told about
Curlin the man as it unfolds, should Curlin
win the Derby. For, although Charlie
Curlin's confusion over his wartime identity
might seem strange to us, it could have been
more the norm in the context of his time
and place."
"If only we had an
explanation from Charlie Curlin himself,
we might understand how it was for a veteran
of the federal army's U.S. Colored
Troops who returned home to live in a county
that had wanted to secede from the United
States."
" Kentucky's Civil
War history is confusing enough when
viewed from the whites-only perspective.
Imagine how it must have been for
African Americans who could not read and
probably did not often hear the
truth."
" The
"truth" for anyone, black or
white, depended on the Kentucky county where
you heard it. Some counties were
predominantly Unionist, others largely
Confederate. Kentucky did officially
side with the Union, after a few months of
neutrality, but never was unified in its
Northern or Southern sympathies, either during
the war or afterward."
" All this confusion
had to affect the slaves just as it did
white people, although whites generally did
not consider the slaves' perspective
when writing early versions of Kentucky
history. Slaves throughout Kentucky might have
understood the war on varying terms,
depending on where they lived. For most, the
war presented an opportunity to run
away. And they did leave, in the thousands,
expressing their urgent desire to be
free."
" Many chose to
enlist in the U.S. Colored Troops as a
way to gain freedom for themselves and their
families. Many also came into the
Colored Troops involuntarily, impressed by the
federal army. A total of 23,703 Kentuckians
went into the U.S. Colored Troops.
Soldiers in the Colored Troops found status
among themselves and self-esteem,
outfitted with rifles when, as slaves, they
had been forbidden to carry arms. They
admired themselves in their army
uniforms."
" Whites throughout
Kentucky regarded the Colored Troops
with hatred. The very idea of people seen as
slaves carrying arms was frightening and
repulsive. The U.S. Colored Cavalry endured
taunts and assaults from whites as the
soldiers marched out from Camp Nelson to
leave for battle in Virginia. Whites knocked
off the soldiers' hats. They stole some
of their horses, too."
" Charlie Curlin's
descendants do not know precisely how
his enlistment came about. But his enlistment
and other papers, located at the
National Archives in Washington, D.C., show
he joined the Colored Troops at Bowling Green
in October 1864. Curlin the horse
prompted Cunningham, Curlin's great-grandson,
to hire a researcher to learn more about
the man's story."
"After the horse
started doing well, I said, 'I need to
try to authenticate what happened,'"
Cunningham said. He contacted Alicestyne
Adams, director of Georgetown College's
Underground Railroad Research Institute.
We research a lot of African Americans in
the Civil War," said Adams, who also owns
Yesteryear Research Unlimited Inc., in
Georgetown."
" Adams happened to
be in Washington when Cunningham
telephoned her. She went right away to the
National Archives and began to research
Curlin's military history. The records
produced some curiosities: among them
the spelling of Curlin's name. His enlistment
papers show it as "Curling."
" Later, the
"g" is dropped. The muster
roll shows that Curlin "owed services to
James Curling," a landowner at
Golden Pond, Trigg County. The records
describe Curlin, or Curling, as
5-foot-4, weighing 145 pounds, and born
approximately in 1841 or 1842. He was
thought to be age 21 or 22 when he joined the
Colored Troops."
" His unit was the
Thirteenth Heavy Artillery and his job,
as Cunningham described, "was like an
ammunition mule. He was loaded down with
ammunition. He said he was injured from having
to walk long distances with heavy ammunition
on his back."
" The disabilities --
an injured back and a hernia --
explained Curlin's mustering-out of the army
in 1865 before his three-year term had
ended. But when he applied for a disability
pension, Curlin faced a maze of bureaucratic
stonewalling. He did not begin
collecting his initial $25 monthly pension
until sometime between 1893 and 1900.
There is no record of back pay."
" Adams, excited
about the information that has turned up
on Curlin, described his military records as
"a great case study, what he had to
go through" to receive his pension.
"He had to go through a lot to get
it," she said."
" Charlie Curlin died
in 1925.
Cunningham, 52,
remembers the family passing on stories about
him and that family lore concerning
Curlin was always a focal point at reunions.
Now the torch passes to Curlin, the horse, to
secure the Curlin family name in
Kentucky Derby lore. "
END
OF ARTICLE
WHAT
A STORY !
Now Shirley Cunningham and
all of us can Celebrate Curlin's Preakness
Victory in a way White America doesn't even
know about nor care about at all ( get it
Spike ?? )
King sculptor
meets stony resistance

By Bartholomew
Sullivan
sullivanb@shns.com
April 11, 2007
WASHINGTON -- The selection of a sculptor from
The Peoples Republic of China to carve the
image of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. in Chinese
granite for his memorial on the National Mall
has Memphis artist Morris T. Howard and many
others upset.
"They've
selected a Chinese sculptor from Communist
China to do it," said Howard, 48, an oil
painter. "There's a lot of
dissatisfaction with that."
The Martin
Luther King Jr. National Memorial Foundation
held a competition for the overall design of
the four-acre memorial and decided on a winner
in 2000 from the 900 entries it received. It
then chose sculptor Lei Yixin after seeing his
work last summer at a St. Paul, Minn.,
sculpting competition, said David L. Hamilton,
retired program manager for the National
Capital Planning Commission.
"It was
absolutely incredible," said Hamilton, a
member of the selection committee.
Hamilton said
any time a major project is proposed for the
National Mall, which he called "America's
front yard," there is controversy. When
Maya Lin, a Yale University architecture
student from Ohio, was selected to do the
Vietnam Veterans Memorial, detractors called
her a "gook" and "the
enemy," Hamilton recalled.
"Dr. King
was a national and an international
figure," Hamilton added. "Dr. King's
message was spiritually based. Dr. King was
talking about the content of a person's
character, as opposed to the color of his
skin. Quite simply, we were looking for the
best sculptor."
A spokesman for
the foundation, Rica Rodman Orszag, noted that
90 percent of the committee that selected Lei
are African-Americans.
What has Howard
and Atlanta artist Gilbert Young dismayed is
that the committee even considered going
outside the African-American community to make
its selection for the artistic elements of the
first monument dedicated to a black man on the
Mall. Young says the project, which has raised
$87 million of a planned $100 million, has
been hijacked by corporate interests.
"It's a
smack in our face.... It insults our
community. It insults our craftsmanship,"
said Young, 65, who has created the Web site
KingIsOurs.com in protest. "You mean to
tell me we couldn't find a stone in America
that was good enough? You mean to tell me we
couldn't find a black artist who was good
enough?"
Young has taken
to talk radio to drum up opposition to the
selection of the ROMA Design Group, the
selection of Lei, and the use of Chinese
granite. He says the sculpture should come
from rock hewn from Stone Mountain in Georgia,
mentioned in King's 1963 "I Have a
Dream" speech from the steps of the
Lincoln Memorial.
The memorial
will be along the Tidal Basin between the
Jefferson and Lincoln memorials.
Howard, 48, who
as a Navy submariner served on both the U.S.S.
Tennessee and the U.S.S. Memphis, said he
called WDIA radio to raise the issue in
Memphis but that there wasn't a lot of
response. He said the selection of an
African-American artist for such a
high-profile project would lift the
self-esteem of black youths.
"This is
just another opportunity that I hope hasn't
been squandered," he said.
Beverly
Robertson, director of the National Civil
Rights Museum in Memphis, said she can
understand how African-American artists could
feel "slighted." She said that
normally, when the centerpiece for a historic
site is selected, a call for artists is made
both in the U.S. and abroad, and a panel of
judges selects the submission that best
represents what it's seeking.
For the King
memorial, the selection committee didn't
invite submissions for the sculpture. It
visited the Minnesota Rocks! International
Stone Carving Symposium in St. Paul, began
discussions with Lei, and then visited with
him in China.
As for the
selection of a Chinese artist, Robertson said
King inspired admiration and respect around
the world and "his impact is felt by all
people of all races, colors, creeds,
religions. ... He doesn't just belong to us in
this country. He belongs to the world."
--
Bartholomew Sullivan: (202) 408-2726
Previous
memorial controversies
Some objected
to the architectural style of the World War II
Memorial, dedicated in 2004, saying it was
reminiscent of the grandiose projects of Nazi
architect and planner Albert Speer.
When Maya Lin
designed the sunken V in black granite now
known simply as "The Wall" for the
Vietnam Veterans Memorial, dedicated in 1982,
traditionalists objected and a sculpture of
three servicemen by sculptor Frederick Hart
was added in 1986. Scuptor Glena Goodacre's
Vietnam Women's Memorial was added in 1993.
A group calling
itself Save Our Mall has repeatedly suggested
the public space is growing too congested --
with monuments.
African-Americans
may see contracts
Harry E.
Johnson Sr., president and CEO of the Martin
Luther King Jr. National Memorial Project
Foundation, said that "if at all
possible," the foundation hopes to award
the $58 million to $66 million construction
contract for the memorial to a firm headed by
African-Americans.
Darfur
Awareness Rally
Raising
Awareness for the Victims of the Sudanese
Genocide
Thursday,
April 19th
11:00am
- 1:00pm
George
Mason University - Quad
4400
University Drive, Fairfax, Virginia
Join
the Senior Social Work Students for
Music,
Dance, and Phenomenal Speakers
Featured
Speakers:
Joe
Madison ~ Elnour
Adam ~ Adam Russell
Mohamed
Yahya ~ Amal
Allagabo
Performances
by:
Indigo
Sun ~ Mikuak Rai
~ Kristen Arant
Kukuwa
Nuamah ~ Mark
Francis Nickens
Princess
of Controversy
*Refreshments
Served*
UNITED MOVEMENT TO END CHILD SOLDIERING
www.endchildsoldiering.org
In
response to the global scourge of child
soldiering,
the wars that perpetuate child soldiering and
the poverty and displacement created by war,
United Movement to End Child Soldiering (UMECS)
was established to address the needs of
communities, children, youth and women
affected by war and grassroots organizations
serving these needs.
Anchored
in Uganda,
our geographic focus is Great Lakes Region and
Southern Africa
. What distinguishes us from other
organizations is our programs are
community-based, our staff comes from the same
communities in which we work and our major
goals combine upliftment of youth through
education, peace building and community
development.
In
Northern Uganda,
a war has devastated the lives of people
steeped in strong traditions from once land
rich communities, displacing millions to
squalid Internally Displaced Persons (IDP)
camps where hunger stalks children. Murder of
civilians, rape and mutilation are weapons of
war and abducted children are the soldier of
choice. Up to 60,000 children have been
abducted, many of whom have been forced to
commit unspeakable atrocities in their own
communities.
Our
Programs
Sponsor former child soldiers and
formerly abducted children and youth living in
IDP camps in
Northern Uganda
war zones in secondary schools and higher
education, with counseling, guidance,
mentorship, and other services.
Build capacity and provide service to
grassroots organizations serving children,
women and communities in
Northern Uganda
's war zones
Combine peace building, rehabilitation
of youth, community development, and land
management activities in conflict-affected
communities
INVITES
YOU TO A FUNDRAISER HOSTED BY
JOHN
CHAMBERS
President, Board
of Directors
Host
Committee:
Beverly
Barnes, Maureen Bunyan, Eric Easter, Shane
Evans, Melissa Fitzgerald,
Gabrielle
Glore, Gediyon Kifle, Joe Madison, Jacob
Mann, Arthur Serota
On
Saturday April 14, 2007
Address:
1212 Lamont
Street, NW (13th & Lamont)
Washington, DC
20010
7:00 - 9:00
pm: Silent Auction, Live Music, Cocktail
Reception
9:00 - 12:00
midnight: DJ, Saturday Night House Party
$25 Friend
$75 Patron $150 Benefactor
United
Movement to End Child Soldiering (UMECS) sponsors
secondary and higher education for former
child soldiers and formerly abducted
children and youth living in IDP camps in
Northern Uganda war zones. UMECS' mission
includes providing counseling and mentorship
to students, as well as peace building,
community development, and grassroots
organizational support in conflict-affected
communities.
Metro:
Columbia Heights Metro Station/Green Line
Parking:
Giant Supermarket on Park Road between 13th
and 14th Streets - $2.00 per hour
Exit parking lot and walk left toward 13th
Street, turn right on 13th and
turn left on Lamont
UMECS
is a registered 501c3 non-profit
organization and a registered NGO in Uganda
All
checks payable to: United
Movement to End Child Soldiering
UMECS
is a (501) (c) (3) tax-exempt non-profit
organization and a registered Non-Governmental
Organization (NGO) in
Uganda
GREAT DECISIONS
Child Soldiering in Modern Society
by Arthur Serota
I
come from a culture where traditionally,
children are seen as both our present and our
future so I have always believed it is our
responsibility as adults to give children
futures worth having. In the two years spent
on this report, I have beenshocked and angered
to see how shamefully we have failed in this
responsibility.
From a Personal Note by Graca
Machel, introducing the Report
of Graca Machel,
Expert of the Secretary-General of the United
Nations: Impact of Armed Conflict on Children.
Notwithstanding the considerable gains
society has made throughout the world, wars
and their aftermath continue to set back the
rights of people and communities to live in
peace, prosperity and pass along something
worthwhile to the next generation.
War has always been devastating to
humanity.
However, how wars are conducted today
has worsened their impact on civilians,
especially women and children. Today's wars
are different from wars of the past when
mostly male armies attacked opposing male
armies. Looking back to the era of WW I,
approximately 90% of the casualties of war
then were combatants and 10% were unarmed
civilians. Today, that paradigm has
dramatically shifted. In today's wars,
approximately 85-90% of the casualties are
unarmed civilians, mostly women and children.
This is no accident. This
paradigm of who dies and who lives occurs in
such large numbers because the strategies of
today's wars have changed. Today's wars
are intended
to terrorize and win the "hearts and
minds" of civilian populations. This entails
committing wholesale atrocities on women and
children, such as what happened in Bosnia and
the Democratic Republic of Congo, Sierra
Leone, Liberia, Mozambique and Angola - to
name just a very few examples in recent times
- and continues elsewhere today. In today's
wars, rape is a weapon of war and mutilating
and killing civilians is the modus operandi.
As the paradigm of how today's wars
has shifted, children and adolescents -
vulnerable, easily manipulated and
disoriented, traumatized, unpaid, physically
fit and blindly obedient - are the soldier of
choice. Globally, where targeting and
terrorizing civilians is the modus operandi of
armed conflict, child soldiering has become
institutionalized as a component of armed
conflict.
Whereas
child soldiering takes place throughout the
world, including in Burma/Myanmar,
Sri Lanka
,
Bhutan
,
Colombia
and Eastern Europe, child soldiering in
Africa
has become a pandemic. Child Soldiering in
Africa - and the needs of former child
soldiers and their communities - has and
continues to affect major segments of society
in Angola, Mozambique, Uganda, Rwanda,
Democratic Republic of Congo, Burundi, Sudan,
Chad, Sierra Leone, Liberia, Guinea,
Guinea-Bissau, Algeria, Central Africa
Republic, Somalia, Ethiopia, Eritrea, and the
Republic of Congo.
I
work in
Northern Uganda
where a twenty year war has devastated the
local population and direct an organization
called United Movement to End Child Soldiering
(UMECS). I was first exposed to child
soldiering in the 1980's and 90's while
teaching secondary school and conducting rural
development projects in Zimbabwe on the
Mozambique border. There, a proxy army known
as RENAMO was attacking rural villages in
Mozambique
and
Zimbabwe
. Between 1986-1991, RENAMO killed over one
million civilians in
Mozambique
and many thousands in
Zimbabwe
, conducting the most unspeakable atrocities.
Many RENAMO "soldiers" were children,
forcibly abducted by RENAMO to commit these
atrocities. While I was living there, many
civilians were brutally murdered, raped, and
mutilated in neighboring villages.
In
Northern Uganda
, a rebel army called the Lord's Resistance
Army (LRA) has been waging war against the
Government of Uganda. The victims of this war,
however, are the pastoralist Acholi
communities of
Northern Uganda
who have been caught in the crossfire of the
LRA and Government forces. 85% of the LRA's
army are abducted children, some as young as
eight years old. Girls as well as boys are
abducted, with the average age of abduction
between 12 and 14. In addition to being
trained as fighters, girls become sex slaves
to LRA commanders.
More than two million people in
Northern Uganda
have been displaced from their land and
cattle-rich villages to squalid Internally
Displaced Persons (IDP) camps where hunger
stalks children, and hundreds of people -
mostly children under five - die
each week from preventable and curable
diseases. Tens of thousands of women have been
raped and mutilated in LRA raids, and over
60,000 children and adolescents have been
abducted, many pressed into child soldiering.
Our work in
Northern Uganda
is focused on eradicating child soldiering,
addressing the root causes of war through
peacebuilding, building the capacity of
grassroots organizations serving the needs of
children, youth and women affected by armed
conflict, and directly addressing the needs of
children and youth, including former child
soldiers, in the war zones.
What many organizations and programs
including our own have discovered is that all
children and youth in war zones have been
deeply affected by conflict. In addition,
children and youth who have been abducted,
and/or have been forced into child soldiering
have additional rehabilitation needs. That
said, the greater discovery is that, contrary
to popular belief outside war zones, formerly
abducted children and former child soldiers
respond well and successfully to programs and
services that address their needs, and the
most effective strategies combine cultural and
community traditions with secular services.
This works best because such children and
youth are not "walking time bombs" as the
popular stereotype has it but were raised
within strong traditional families and
communities. Although recently escaped former
child soldiers remain traumatized for a while
and need sufficient time to heal and restore,
including initial specialized rehabilitation
in safe, professional centers, former child
soldiers and formerly abducted children
actually excel in education, jobs training
programs and community-minded endeavors. The
examples throughout the world are numerous -
how rehabilitation leads to success, how
success nurtures hope and how the power of
hope restores humanity.
In
Northern Uganda, three of our inter-related
programs foster success and hope with 78
children and youth deeply affected by armed
conflict, approximately 60% of whom were
formerly abducted children, many of whom are
former child soldiers forced to commit
repeated atrocities in their own communities.
These programs are known as: Northern Uganda
Education Program (NUEP); Northern Uganda
Internship Program (NUIP) and Peace Fellows
Program (PFP).
Now in Year III, our Northern Uganda
Education Program selects our students using
criteria of vulnerability, orphaned children,
academic readiness, community accountability
and gender balance. We follow a community-led
process in which our staff and community
members, local leaders, IDP camp leaders and
primary school staff collaborate in the
selection process to ensure transparency and
fairness. We do not intentionally select
"former child soldiers" as this tends to
divide communities in great need. However, by
following a community-led selection process,
approximately 60% of selectees are formerly
abducted children and former child soldiers.
We then make a commitment to our new
students for their entire secondary and higher
education journey, with an ongoing regimen of
high expectations and standards. We also
enroll our students in "partnered secondary
boarding schools," i.e. schools we have
investigated and built relationship. Hence, we
send our students in small teams or cohorts,
which creates peer support and peer
mentorship, to partnered schools.
What makes our program successful - 97%
of our students since January 2005 have stayed
in school and stayed in the program - is our
holistic approach. We pay for all school fees,
school uniforms, medical exams, scholastic
materials, school and sports attire,
calculators, math kits, mattresses, trunks,
personal hygiene supplies and transport.
In addition, through an all
Northern Uganda
education staff, we provide ongoing
mentorship, counseling, and guidance,
including career counseling. To address the
psychosocial needs of our students affected by
trauma from their war experiences, we launched
a Counseling and Guidance Program in
collaboration with
Africa
University
.
What provides the greatest amount of
hope and motivation is our higher education
component. Secondary school education is
important but by itself, will not provide jobs
or sufficient opportunities. Higher education
is essential and
Northern Uganda
needs to restore itself with professionals in
healthcare, education, social work,
agriculture, environmental programs,
engineering, community planning, and
entrepreneurship.
Tied in with these strategies is our
Northern Uganda Internship Program, partnered
with
Africa
University
's
Institute
of
Peace
, Leadership and Governance (IPLG). Also in
Year III, this program brings mature graduate
students from around Africa (
Zimbabwe
,
Liberia
, and
Kenya
) who are classroom teachers, counselors,
peacebuilders, trainers and business managers
who serve as additional mentors to our
students. In this way, mature, successful,
culturally connected role models from Africa
serve youth with needs in
Northern Uganda
. It
has been a highly successful component.
Finally, we sponsor university graduates
from Northern Uganda war zones to the
Institute of Peace, Leadership and Governance
two year graduate program at Africa University
as Peace Fellows who return to their
communities as peacebuilding practitioners.
Through our 78 students, we serve many
families and communities in addition to our
students and schools, but it is a small number
compared to the hundreds of thousands of
secondary-school age youth in Northern Uganda
IDP camps not in school. Other organizations
also provide education programs, although with
fewer holistic services and shorter term
commitments.
What is needed is a huge boost in
education resources for children and youth
now, while they are children and youth. We
advocate collaboratively for the right of
children and youth in Uganda to be educated
and there is nothing that substitutes for
primary, secondary and higher education. What
makes this vision even more exciting is the
zeal Ugandan children and youth have for
reading and learning.
The war in
Northern Uganda
has been winding down. Although formal peace
talks between the Lord's Resistance Army and
the Government of Uganda have been stalled
since they began eight months ago, there have
been no war-related incidents of violence in
Northern Uganda
since they began. Although 1.4 million people
remain confined to IDP camps, fearing
insecurity if they return home, approximately
300,000 people have returned to their
villages, rebuilding their houses, restoring
their lands and restocking their livestock.
The holiday season in December and January was
peaceful for the first time in 20 years.
In early February, 60 nations, including
many in Africa, Asia and
Latin America
where child soldiering has been rife
participated in the "Paris Conference on
Child Soldiering."
Although largely symbolic, the
conference was a positive step forward to
recognize and condemn child soldiering as an
intolerable global scourge. This article from
the February 6, 2007
Chicago
Sun-Times, Nations
Pledge Not to Use Child Soldiers, tells
more: http://www.suntimes.com/news/world/245761,soldiers020607.article
Two excellent book resources:
A Long Way Gone: Memoirs of a Boy Soldier,
by Ishmael Beah
Innocents Lost: When Child Soldiers Go to
War, by Jimmie Briggs
"A
CHINESE MARTIN LUTHER KING, JR.!!"
By
Gilbert Young
One
of the greatest men in history said if a man
is not willing to die for something he is not
fit to live. I believe that to be true. In
today's society, standing up for a
belief-especially if it seems politically
incorrect-can be the same as dying. As a
professional who just turned sixty-five, I know
that to be true.
Still, I'm willing to yell at the top
of my lungs my disgust at the decision made by
the King Memorial Foundation to choose a
Chinese artist to sculpt the image of Martin
Luther King Jr., for the first ever national
memorial to an African American man.
Where
are those who are supposed to protect the
ideals and champion the cause? Among those
pretending to be in charge are obviously too
many who can not see the travesty of justice
in having the "national treasure of
China," Lei Yixin-that's Communist
China-sculpt the center piece of the most
important African American monument, in
recognition of the most important African
American movement in the history of the United
States. A movement that never could have taken
place in
China
. I
am appalled.
Is
it that Alpha Phi Alpha, one of the
country's oldest African American
fraternities, and the executive staff of the
King Memorial project-also all black, and
the Memorial Foundation Leadership, could not
find one African American sculptor good enough
to create a likeness of King?
That's crazy. You best believe, there
is not ONE national memorial, not ONE monument
to a leader or historical event in
China
,
Russia
,
France
,
Italy
,
India
,
Germany
-go ahead and name them all-that has the
name of an African American artist engraved in
its base.
It's probably not that they don't
like us or appreciate our abilities. It's
that a commission of such importance is a
legacy for a country and its countrymen.
Why should the
King
Monument
be any different?
Here
was the opportunity for a national monument to
a Black man in Washington D.C., to be created,
developed, designed, and executed by the best
that African America arts and culture and
development has to offer, a testament to all
our own achievements as Black people who
benefited from Martin Luther King, Jr. and the
Civil Rights Movement. There won't be a
second chance to make our first
impression.
Yet once again our worth is kicked to
the curb.
So
far, creating and developing the site of the
King Memorial has gone to the ROMA Group, out
of
San Francisco
, a group headed by Boris Dramov.
The historic centerpiece of the King
Memorial is supposed to be created by the
Chinese guy.
So let's see-that leaves the
digging and hauling, which in some folks'
eyes may be appropriate because this nation was
built on the backs of Blacks. I, for one, am
not willing to bob my head and grin over the
fact that some Black subcontractor will be
employed to move the dirt. Nor am I willing to
allow my children's children to visit a
memorial that will not reflect African
American art and culture and artistry.
What was the Civil Rights Movement all
about?
Lei
Yixin is politics, and politics was not
King's way.
We all know, as
U.S.
citizens, how much money our government owes
the Chinese (and everybody else).
But here's the thing; the artistic
accomplishments of African Americans has long
been celebrated.
We too have national treasures, and low
and behold some of them are sculptors.
More importantly, politics should not
be allowed to sell the legacy of the Reverend
Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. and the historic
impact of the Civil Rights movement to the
Chinese.
"The
Reverend Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., by Lei
Yixin"
Whose
artistry and history will that plaque honor
300 years from now? The answer is NOT OURS.
As
an artist, I stand against it-even if I
stand alone.
Gilbert
Young
P.O. Box 7190
Atlanta
,
GA
30357
Youngartone@aol.com
678-886-2271

LETS
SAY I BREAK INTO YOUR HOUSE
A
lady wrote the best letter in the
Editorials in ages!!! It
explains things better than all the
baloney you hear on TV.
Her
point:
Recently
large demonstrations have taken place
across the country protesting the fact
that Congress is finally addressing the
issue of illegal immigration.
Certain
people are angry that the US
might protect its own borders, might make
it harder to sneak into this country and,
once here, to stay indefinitely.
Let
me see if I correctly understand the
thinking behind these protests.
Let's
say I break into your house.
Let's
say that when you discover me in your
house, you insist that I leave.
But
I say, "I've made all the beds and
washed the dishes and did the laundry and
swept the floors.
I've
done all the things you don't like to do.
I'm
hard-working and honest (except for when I
broke into your house).
According
to the protesters:
·
You are Required to let me stay in
your house
·
You are Required to add me to your
family's insurance plan
·
You are Required to Educate my kids
·
You
are Required to Provide other benefits to
me and to my family
(my husband will do all of your yard work
because he is also hard-working and
honest, except for that breaking in part).
If
you try to call the police or force me
out, I will call my friends who will
picket your house carrying signs that
proclaim my RIGHT to be there.
It's
only fair, after all, because you have a
nicer house than I do, and I'm just trying
to better myself.
I'm a hard-working and honest, person,
except for well, you know, I did break
into your house.
And what a deal it is for
me!!! I live in your house,
contributing only a fraction of the cost
of my keep, and there is nothing you can
do about it without being accused of cold,
uncaring, selfish, prejudiced, and bigoted
behavior. Oh yeah, I DEMAND that you to
learn MY LANGUAGE!! so you can communicate
with me.
Why
can't people see how ridiculous this is?!
Only in America
.....if you agree, pass it on (in
English). Share it if you see the value of
it.
If
not blow it off......... along with your
future Social Security funds, and a lot of
other things
Back
to top
|
|
|
Asian
paper's 'I Hate Blacks' column assailed
San
Francisco Chronicle, Leslie Fulbright,
Staff Writer
Tuesday, February 27, 2007

A
San Francisco weekly newspaper that bills
itself as "The Voice of Asian
America" is facing harsh criticism from
that very community for publishing a column
Friday titled "Why I Hate Blacks."
In the column, AsianWeek regular contributor
Kenneth Eng listed "reasons" to discriminate against African
Americans. The piece has been pulled from the newspaper's Web site, but the
print edition of the free paper, owned by the politically influential Fang
family, was still available in news racks Monday.
Eng called himself an "Asian
supremacist" in January in another installment of the column, which runs
under the label "God of the Universe."
Prominent Asian Americans immediately condemned
Eng's current column.
"The hate is based on ignorance and is very
similar to the rationales that the KKK uses against African Americans,"
said Henry Der, director for 22 years of Chinese for Affirmative Action and the
former state administrator for Emeryville's schools.
"What gives me the greatest concern was
AsianWeek's judgment in printing such a piece out of context," Der said.
"It is so trite and hateful, it doesn't speak well for the
publication."
San Francisco NAACP President Amos Brown, who
heard about the column from a Chronicle reporter, was speechless at first.
"I can't believe this," Brown then
said. "I am surprised the Fangs, who have supposedly been involved in
interracial-understanding issues, would publish something like this. I am
flabbergasted. We can't afford for these kind of racist flames to be fueled in
that kind of setting."
AsianWeek issued a statement regretting "any
offense caused by the one opinion piece," and Editor in Chief Samson Wong
declined further comment.
Editor at large Ted Fang did not return phone
calls seeking comment. Members of his family, who are Chinese American, have
owned a number of local publications, including AsianWeek and the Independent.
They bought the Examiner in 2000 and sold it in 2004.
Ted Fang's brother James, who is president of the
paper, has spent more than a decade on the BART Board of Directors and
previously worked as international trade director for former San Francisco Mayor
Frank Jordan.
Eng's "reasons" for hating black people
include:
-- "Blacks hate us. Every Asian who has ever
come across them knows that they take almost every opportunity to hurl racist
remarks at us."
-- "Contrary to media depictions, I would
argue that blacks are weak-willed. They are the only race that has been enslaved
for 300 years."
-- "Blacks are easy to coerce. This is
proven by the fact that so many of them, including the Rev. Al Sharpton, tend to
be Christians."
Eng, who is in his early 20s, according to
material on the Internet promoting his science fiction writing, started at
AsianWeek in November after moving from the East Coast. In 2004, for an online
magazine called Down in the Dirt, he wrote about experiencing racism as an Asian
American student at New York University after he "expressed my negative
views on America, religion and African Americans."
Other AsianWeek columns of Eng's -- including
"Proof That Whites Inherently Hate Us" and "Why I Hate
Asians" -- have resulted in criticism. In the first, he complained about
the scarcity of Asian heroes in the media. In the second, he described Asian
Americans as apathetic, brown-nosing and lacking in cultural pride.
Eng could not be reached for comment Monday.
Leaders of the Asian Law Caucus, Asian American
Justice Center, Chinese for Affirmative Action and other groups and individuals
began circulating a petition Friday calling for the paper to apologize,
terminate its relationship with Eng, print an editorial refuting the column and
review its editorial policy. The leaders' statement, issued in Washington, D.C.,
called the piece "irresponsible journalism, blatantly racist, replete with
stereotypes and deeply hurtful to African Americans."
In its statement, AsianWeek, which has a
circulation of 48,505, said it "sincerely regrets any offense caused by the
one opinion piece which reflected that author's personal views. We apologize for
any harm or hurt this has caused the African American community. AsianWeek has
great respect for all that the African American community has done for Asian
Pacific Americans."
David Lee of the Chinese American Voters
Education Committee said Eng's statement echoes the feelings of some Asian
Americans. He said that rather than condemning the paper, black and Asian people
should participate in a town hall-style meeting to address tension he said
exists between the two communities.
"There is a segment that feels the way Eng
does, but the sentiment is underground and not brought to the surface," Lee
said. "If you don't have a discussion, then I think it allows these types
of views to fester and turn into something much more negative. Rather than
refute and bury this, we should be calling for a community dialogue to address
this."
The paper said it will announce in this Friday's
edition plans to co-sponsor a town hall-style meeting with the Willie L. Brown
Jr. Institute on Politics & Public Service.
"What this controversy points out is the
lack of community leadership in addressing the critical and difficult issues of
race relations, particularly between Asian Pacific Americans and African
Americans," the paper's statement said.
San Francisco writer Claire Light, one of several
bloggers who wrote about the column over the weekend, said the newspaper in
general -- and especially Eng's column -- makes her embarrassed to be Asian. She
said that "most Asian Americans have never even heard of AsianWeek, much
less agree with its editorial decision making."
Der said the column was offensive not only to
African Americans but to everyone -- and especially because it was published
during Black History Month.
"It is pretty despicable that the piece
would do that at this time," he said. "If we are to talk about race
and issues, then there should be a thoughtful presentation of the diverse views
on this topic. If they had done that, however offensive, we would at least
understand it in the context in the larger community."
Ling-chi Wang, retired chairman of the ethnic
studies department at UC Berkeley, said there is an urgent need for Asian
Americans to be aware of the history of this country and know that Asian
American gains have come largely as a result of the efforts of black people.
"Personal experiences cannot be
generalized," Wang said. "It is really sad to see the racism sentiment
being expressed so publicly. I can't believe Ted Fang would allow such a column
to go to print. It is really offensive and damaging and is not one that
contributes to a better understanding of diversity.
"I was very disappointed to see it
published, and I'm glad there are people protesting."
Back
to top
|
| Dingell:
Thanks, but I'm not the second-most
senior -- yet |
| By
The Hill Staff |
| March
03, 2005 |
|
From
Rep. John D. Dingell (D-Mich.):
While I am flattered that you
wrote about my "nearly
legendary" 50 years and two months
in Congress in your March 1 Under
the Dome column, I need to let you
know that the statement is only
"nearly correct."
I was sworn into office on Dec. 13,
1955, by Speaker Sam Rayburn
[D-Texas], a real legend and a
mentor of mine when I was a young
member. On Aug. 26, 2004, I proudly
surpassed Speaker Rayburn's tenure
in office, becoming the fourth
longest serving member of the House.
However, I have yet to bypass the
third longest serving member,
Emanuel Celler [D-N.Y.], who served
49 years, 10 months and 13 days -
although I plan to do so on Oct. 14
of this year.
On Feb. 16, 2006, I also look
forward to passing Carl Vinson's
[D-Ga.] tenure of 50 years, two
months and 13 days to become the
second longest serving member of the
House. As you mention in your
article, the late Jamie Whitten
[D-Miss.] holds the record for
service in the House with 53 years,
two months and 13 days, and, while
it would be a great honor to hold
this record myself, ultimately I
hope to be remembered not for the
length of my tenure but instead for
my effectiveness and accomplishments
as a legislator.
Also referenced in the article was
the fact that my late father, John
Dingell Sr. [D-Mich.], was one of
the architects of Social Security.
This is absolutely true and
continues to be a source of pride
for me today. Dad stood behind
President Roosevelt when he signed
the Social Security law, and now I
am standing behind the working men
and women whom Social Security
protects to preserve that law.
Washington, D.C.
Understanding Social
Security
From
Keith Mauck:
Social Security doesn't make sense
to me. Even as a teenager earning
$1,000 a summer, I wondered, "Why
do I give FICA my money for 50 years
of my life, only to get it back at
marginal returns? Of course, that is
if I live past 65 years. (Won't I
be too old to spend it?)"
Those among us making under $90,000
annually pay into the system to fund
the Social Security checks of the
retired. Counter to the beliefs of
my grandparents, who are living in a
nice retirement community in
Florida, there is no "lock box"
keeping their life-long
contributions safe.
I don't mind funding my
grandparents' retirement. I see it
as a "time-share investment."
They move to Florida and I go mooch
off them. It's a cheap vacation.
My grandparents aren't alone in
their dependency on Social Security;
half of all seniors rely upon it for
the majority of their retirement
income. It's time to start
equipping the citizenry to manage
their retirement savings.
President Bush's plan to include
personal retirement accounts in the
reform of Social Security will begin
this financial empowerment.
Borrowing, large tax increases and
cutting benefits should be ruled out
as answers. Each of these would stop
a growing economy in its tracks.
Personal accounts that would take
the form of a 401(k) or individual
retirement account are the most
sensible.
If Congress can't get this done
soon, I'd be happy to donate all
of my 16 years of FICA contributions
to Social Security for an ability to
opt out of the system. I'll do
this gladly, especially when I view
my 2005 Social Security statement
and realize I could have done
better.
Cheasapeake, Va.
African-American voices on
the radio
From
Michael Beverly:
I am disturbed by the article
about the biggest names in talk
radio in Washington, D.C. ("D.C.
mouths among 100 most important
hosts"), in your March 1 Under the
Dome column.
You overlooked one of the most
influential, powerful and popular
African-American voices in talk
radio in the Washington, D.C. area
and the country who is on the 2005
list compiled by Talkers Magazine,
Joe Madison of WOL AM 1450, based in
Lanham, Md. He is also nationally
syndicated on the Power, XM radio
Channel 169.
As a young African-American
professional on Capitol Hill who
reads your publication, this is
frankly insulting. Joe Madison is
one of only three African Americans
on the magazine's "Heavy
Hundred" list. He is inspiring to
all who listen to him and connects
very often with African American
members on Capitol Hill.
Your insensitivity in overlooking
such a key figure in talk radio and
the African-American community
coming off the heels of Black
History Month makes this oversight
all the more disturbing. I hope you
will make note of this oversight in
a future publication to the Capitol
Hill community who reads your paper.
Washington, D.C.
Back
to top |
|
Asian-Americans
condemn 'Why I Hate Blacks' column
POSTED: 9:49 p.m. EST, February 27,
2007
SAN
FRANCISCO, California (AP)
-- Asian-American leaders are calling on a
weekly newspaper to apologize and cut ties
with a writer who penned a column titled
"Why I Hate Blacks."
In the piece,
which appeared in the February 23 edition of
San Francisco-based AsianWeek, contributor
Kenneth Eng lists reasons why he supports
discrimination against blacks, writing,
among other things, "I would argue that
blacks are weak-willed. They are the only
race that has been enslaved for 300
years."
An official
at the nationally circulated paper
apologized and called the column's
publication a mistake.
Leaders at
the Asian American Justice Center, Chinese
for Affirmative Action, Coalition for Asian
Pacific Americans and other groups are
circulating a petition denouncing the piece
as "irresponsible journalism, blatantly
racist, replete with stereotypes, and deeply
hurtful to African Americans."
The petition
calls on AsianWeek to cut ties with Eng,
issue an apology, print an editorial
refuting the column, and fire or demote the
editors who published it.
"Something
like this should never have been
printed," said Vincent Eng, deputy
director of the Asian American Justice
Center in Washington, who is not related to
the columnist. "Deliberate action needs
to be taken to make sure this type of hate
speech doesn't continue."
AsianWeek,
with a circulation of 48,505, issued a
statement apologizing for "any harm or
hurt this has caused the African American
community."
The newspaper
plans to hold a news conference with NAACP
leaders in San Francisco on Wednesday to
discuss how the Asian and black communities
"can be different and yet get along and
work together," said Ted Fang, the
paper's editor at large.
"The
newspaper is sorry that this got published,
and I am personally sorry that this got
published," Fang told The Associated
Press. "The views in that opinion piece
do not in any way reflect the views of
AsianWeek."
The paper
plans to review its policies to
"understand how this happened and make
sure it doesn't happen again," Fang
said, calling the decision to publish Eng's
piece a "mistake."
Fang's family
publishes AsianWeek, along with a local
newspaper called the Independent, and owned
the San Francisco Examiner between 2000 and
2004. AsianWeek calls itself "The Voice
of Asian America."
The column
was among several written by Kenneth Eng,
who has described himself as an "Asian
Supremacist." Previous columns have
been titled "Proof That Whites
Inherently Hate Us" and "Why I
Hate Asians."
A telephone
listing for Eng could not be located.
Sophie
Maxwell, one of the city's top black
officials and a member of the city's board
of supervisors, said she doesn't believe
Eng's column will hurt relations between
blacks and Asians in San Francisco. She has
co-sponsored a city resolution condemning
the article and AsianWeek's decision to
publish it.
"This
man clearly is very ignorant of
African-American history and his own
history, and he's very angry," said
Maxwell, who represents a district with
large black and Asian populations.
Back
to top
|
Penny
Lane was road to slavery
THE
ASSOCIATED PRESS
Sunday,
March 18th 2007
LIVERPOOL,
England - Beatles lovers who seek out
Penny Lane imagine it as that magical
place "in my ears and in my eyes,
there beneath the blue suburban
skies." But it has a sinister
undertone that still reverberates.
The street
in Liverpool, hometown of the Fab Four, is
named after James Penny, a slave trader
and investor in 11 voyages that took 500
to 600 captives at a time to the New
World.
Penny was
among the many who enriched themselves and
their city on human trafficking until the
slave trade was abolished 200 years ago.
Their ships carried millions of human
beings from West Africa to the plantations
of the Americas in a triangular trade that
also brought profitable cargoes of sugar,
tobacco and rum to England.
Liverpool's
rise, says British historian Ray Costello,
is summed up in a carving on a local bank
facade: two black children supporting
Liverpool as Neptune.
"What
it really means is that this bank was
founded on the slave trade," Costello
said.
That
revelation resonates all the more with the
approach of the March 25 anniversary of
the British parliamentary act that
abolished the slave trade in Britain's
colonies 200 years ago - though not
slavery itself.
Liverpool's
past has not gone unacknowledged.
The city
council formally apologized in 1999,
expressing "shame and remorse for the
city's role in this trade in human
misery."
And it has
commissioned statues titled
"Reconciliation," two abstract
bronze figures embracing, which will be
dedicated this year in Richmond, Va., and
Benin, a West African port of call for
Liverpool's slave ships.
On Aug. 23,
the anniversary of the slave uprising in
French-ruled Haiti in 1791, Liverpool will
also open the International Slavery
Museum.
Liverpool
council member Barbara Mace last year
proposed renaming streets associated with
slavery, and was surprised to learn that
Penny Lane was among them. After a lively
controversy the proposal was withdrawn.
Back to top
|
Subject: Black German Holocaust Victims
Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2007 23:02:56 +0000
So much of our history is lost to us because we often don't write the history books, don't film the documentaries, or don't pass the accounts downfrom generation to generation.
One documentary now touring the film festival circuit, telling us to "Always Remember" is "Black Survivors of the Holocaust" (1997). Outside the U.S, the film is entitled "Hitler's Forgotten Victims" (Afro-Wisdom Productions). It codifies another dimension to the "Never Forget " Holocaust story--our dimension.
Did you know that in the 1920's, there were 24,000 Blacks living in Germany? Neither did I. Here's how it happened, and how many of them were eventually caught unawares by the events of the Holocaust.
Like most West European nations, Germany established colonies in Africa in the late 1800's in what later became Togo, Cameroon, Namibia, and Tanzania. German genetic experiments began there, most notably involving prisoners taken from the 1904 Heroro Massacre that left 60,000 Africans dead, following a 4-year revolt against German colonization.
After the shellacking Germany received in World War I, it was stripped of its African colonies in 1918. As a spoil of war, the French were allowed to occupy Germany in the Rhineland--a bitter piece of real estate that has gone back and forth between the two nations for centuries.
The French willfully deployed their own colonized African soldiers as the occupying force. Germans viewed this as the final insult of World War I, and, soon thereafter, 92% of them voted in the Nazi party.
Hundreds of the African Rhineland -based soldiers intermarried with German women and raised their children as Black Germans. In Mein Kampf, Hitler wrote about his plans for these "Rhineland Bastards". When he came to power, one of his first directives was aimed at these mixed-race children. Underscoring Hitler's obsession with racial purity, by 1937, every identified mixed-race child in the Rhineland had been forcibly sterilized, in order to prevent further "race polluting", as
Hitler termed it.
Hans Hauck, a Black Holocaust survivor and a victim of Hitler's mandatory sterilization program, explained in the film "Hitler's Forgotten Victims" that, when he was forced to undergo sterilization as a teenager, he was given no anesthetic. Once he received his sterilization certificate, he was "free to go", so long as he agreed to have no sexual relations whatsoever with Germans.
Although most Black Germans attemp ted to escape their fatherland, heading for France where people like Josephine Baker & Paul Robeson were steadily aiding and supporting the French Underground, many still encountered problems elsewhere. Nations shut their doors to Germans, including the Black ones.
Some Black Germans were able to eke out a living during Hitler's reign of terror by performing in Vaudeville shows, but many Blacks, steadfast in their belief that they were German first, Black second, opted to remain inGermany. Some fought with the Nazis (a few even became Lutwaffe pilots)! Unfortunately, many Black Germans were arrested, charged with treason, and shipped in cattle cars to concentration camps. Often these trains were so packed with people and (equipped with no bathroom facilities or food), that, after the four-day journey, box car doors were opened to piles of the dead and dying.
Once inside the concentration camps, Blacks were given the worst jobs conceivable . Some Black American soldiers, who were captured and held as prisoners of war, recounted that, while they were being starved and forced into dangerous labor (violating the Geneva Convention), they were still better off than Black German concentration camp detainees, who were forced to do the unthinkable-- man the crematoriums and work in labs where genetic experiments were being conducted. As a final sacrifice, these Blacks were killed every three months so that they would never be able to reveal the inner workings of the "Final Solution".
In every story of Black oppression, no matter how we were enslaved, shackled, or beaten, we always found a way to survive and to rescue others. As a case in point, consider Johnny Voste, a Belgian resistance fighter who was arrested in 1942 for alleged sabotage and then shipped to Dachau. One of his jobs was stacking vitamin crates. Risking his own life, he distributed hundreds of vitamins to camp detainees, which saved the lives of many who were starving, weak, and ill--conditions exacerbated by extreme vitamin deficiencies. His motto was "No, you can't have my life; I will fight for it."
According to Essex University's Delroy Constantine-Simms, there were Black Germans who resisted Nazi Germany, such as Lari Gilges, who founded the Northwest Rann--an organization of entertainers that fought the Nazis in his home town of Dusseldorf--and who was murdered by the SS in 1933, the year that Hitler came into power.
Little information remains about the numbers of Black Germans held in the camps or killed under the Nazi regime. Some victims of the forgetten Nazi sterilization project and Black survivors of the Holocaust are still alive and telling their story in films such as "Black Survivors of the Nazi Holocaust", but they must also speak out for justice, not just history.
Unlike Jews (in Israel and in Germany), Black Germans receive no war reparations because their German citizenship was revoked (even though they were German-born). The only pension they get is from those of us who are willing to tell the world their stories and continue their battle for recognition and compensation.
After the war, scores of Blacks who had somehow managed to survive the Nazi regime, were rounded up and tried as war criminals. Talk about the final insult! There are thousands of Black Holocaust stories, from the triangle trade, to slavery in America, to the gas ovens in Germany.
We often shy away from hearing about our historical past because so much of it is painful; however, we are in this struggle together for rights, dignity, and, yes, reparations for wrongs done to us through the centuries. We need to always remember so that we can take steps to ensure that these atrocities never happen again.
For further information, read: Destined to Witness: Growing Up Black in Nazi Germany, by Hans J. Massaquoi. Thi s black history moment brought to you by Stogie Kenyatta: Paul Robeson black history show
Brenda J. Vondo
Glajan Care Inc
Back
to top
|
|
Bush Moves Toward Martial Law
In a stealth maneuver,
President Bush has signed into law a
provision which, according to Senator
Patrick Leahy (D-Vermont), will actually
encourage the President to declare federal
martial law (1). It does so by revising the
Insurrection Act, a set of laws that limits
the President's ability to deploy troops
within the United States. The Insurrection
Act (10 U.S.C.331 -335) has historically,
along with the Posse Comitatus Act (18
U.S.C.1385), helped to enforce strict
prohibitions on military involvement in
domestic law enforcement. With one cloaked
swipe of his pen, Bush is seeking to undo
those prohibitions.
Public Law 109-364, or
the "John Warner Defense Authorization
Act of 2007" (H.R.5122) (2), which was
signed by the commander in chief on October
17th, 2006, in a private Oval Office
ceremony, allows the President to declare a
"public emergency" and station
troops anywhere in America and take control
of state-based National Guard units without
the consent of the governor or local
authorities, in order to "suppress
public disorder."
President Bush seized
this unprecedented power on the very same
day that he signed the equally odious
Military Commissions Act of 2006. In a
sense, the two laws complement one another.
One allows for torture and detention abroad,
while the other seeks to enforce
acquiescence at home, preparing to order the
military onto the streets of America.
Remember, the term for putting an area under
military law enforcement control is precise;
the term is "martial law."
Section 1076 of the
massive Authorization Act, which grants the
Pentagon another $500-plus-billion for its
ill-advised adventures, is entitled,
"Use of the Armed Forces in Major
Public Emergencies." Section 333,
"Major public emergencies; interference
with State and Federal law" states that
"the President may employ the armed
forces, including the National Guard in
Federal service, to restore public order and
enforce the laws of the United States when,
as a result of a natural disaster, epidemic,
or other serious public health emergency,
terrorist attack or incident, or other
condition in any State or possession of the
United States, the President determines that
domestic violence has occurred to such an
extent that the constituted authorities of
the State or possession are incapable of
("refuse" or "fail" in)
maintaining public order, "in order to
suppress, in any State, any insurrection,
domestic violence, unlawful combination, or
conspiracy."
For the current
President, "enforcement of the laws to
restore public order" means to
commandeer guardsmen from any state, over
the objections of local governmental,
military and local police entities; ship
them off to another state; conscript them in
a law enforcement mode; and set them loose
against "disorderly" citizenry -
protesters, possibly, or those who object to
forced vaccinations and quarantines in the
event of a bio-terror event.
The law also facilitates
militarized police round-ups and detention
of protesters, so called "illegal
aliens," "potential
terrorists" and other
"undesirables" for detention in
facilities already contracted for and under
construction by Halliburton. That's right.
Under the cover of a trumped-up
"immigration emergency" and the
frenzied militarization of the southern
border, detention camps are being
constructed right under our noses, camps
designed for anyone who resists the foreign
and domestic agenda of the Bush
administration.
An article on
"recent contract awards" in a
recent issue of the slick, insider
"Journal of Counterterrorism &
Homeland Security International"
reported that "global engineering and
technical services powerhouse KBR [Kellog,
Brown & Root] announced in January 2006
that its Government and Infrastructure
division was awarded an Indefinite
Delivery/Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) contract
to support U.S. Immigration and Customs
Enforcement (ICE) facilities in the event of
an emergency." "With a maximum
total value of $385 million over a five year
term," the report notes, "the
contract is to be executed by the U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers," "for
establishing temporary detention and
processing capabilities to augment existing
ICE Detention and Removal Operations (DRO) -
in the event of an emergency influx of
immigrants into the U.S., or to support the
rapid development of new programs." The
report points out that "KBR is the
engineering and construction subsidiary of
Halliburton." (3) So, in addition to
authorizing another $532.8 billion for the
Pentagon, including a $70-billion
"supplemental provision" which
covers the cost of the ongoing, mad military
maneuvers in Iraq, Afghanistan, and other
places, the new law, signed by the president
in a private White House ceremony, further
collapses the historic divide between the
police and the military: a tell-tale sign of
a rapidly consolidating police state in
America, all accomplished amidst ongoing
U.S. imperial pretensions of global
domination, sold to an "emergency
managed" and seemingly willfully
gullible public as a "global war on
terrorism."
Make no mistake about it:
the de-facto repeal of the Posse Comitatus
Act (PCA) is an ominous assault on American
democratic tradition and jurisprudence. The
1878 Act, which reads, "Whoever, except
in cases and under circumstances expressly
authorized by the Constitution or Act of
Congress, willfully uses any part of the
Army or Air Force as a posse comitatus or
otherwise to execute the laws shall be fined
under this title or imprisoned not more than
two years, or both," is the only U.S.
criminal statute that outlaws military
operations directed against the American
people under the cover of 'law enforcement.'
As such, it has been the best protection
we've had against the power-hungry
intentions of an unscrupulous and reckless
executive, an executive intent on using
force to enforce its will.
Unfortunately, this past
week, the president dealt posse comitatus,
along with American democracy, a near fatal
blow. Consequently, it will take an aroused
citizenry to undo the damage wrought by this
horrendous act, part and parcel, as we have
seen, of a long train of abuses and outrages
perpetrated by this authoritarian
administration.
Despite the unprecedented
and shocking nature of this act, there has
been no outcry in the American media, and
little reaction from our elected officials
in Congress. On September 19th, a lone
Senator Patrick Leahy (D-Vermont) noted that
2007's Defense Authorization Act contained a
"widely opposed provision to allow the
President more control over the National
Guard [adopting] changes to the Insurrection
Act, which will make it easier for this or
any future President to use the military to
restore domestic order WITHOUT the consent
of the nation's governors."
Senator Leahy went on to
stress that, "we certainly do not need
to make it easier for Presidents to declare
martial law. Invoking the Insurrection Act
and using the military for law enforcement
activities goes against some of the central
tenets of our democracy. One can easily
envision governors and mayors in charge of
an emergency having to constantly look over
their shoulders while someone who has never
visited their communities gives the
orders."
A few weeks later, on the
29th of September, Leahy entered into the
Congressional Record that he had "grave
reservations about certain provisions of the
fiscal Year 2007 Defense Authorization Bill
Conference Report," the language of
which, he said, "subverts solid,
longstanding posse comitatus statutes that
limit the military's involvement in law
enforcement, thereby making it easier for
the President to declare martial law."
This had been "slipped in," Leahy
said, "as a rider with little
study," while "other congressional
committees with jurisdiction over these
matters had no chance to comment, let alone
hold hearings on, these proposals."
In a telling bit of
understatement, the Senator from Vermont
noted that "the implications of
changing the (Posse Comitatus) Act are
enormous". "There is good
reason," he said, "for the
constructive friction in existing law when
it comes to martial law declarations. Using
the military for law enforcement goes
against one of the founding tenets of our
democracy. We fail our Constitution,
neglecting the rights of the States, when we
make it easier for the President to declare
martial law and trample on local and state
sovereignty."
Senator Leahy's final
ruminations: "Since hearing word a
couple of weeks ago that this outcome was
likely, I have wondered how Congress could
have gotten to this point. It seems the
changes to the Insurrection Act have
survived the Conference because the Pentagon
and the White House want it."
The historic and ominous
re-writing of the Insurrection Act,
accomplished in the dead of night, which
gives Bush the legal authority to declare
martial law, is now an accomplished fact.
The Pentagon, as one
might expect, plays an even more direct role
in martial law operations. Title XIV of the
new law, entitled, "Homeland Defense
Technology Transfer Legislative
Provisions," authorizes "the
Secretary of Defense to create a Homeland
Defense Technology Transfer Consortium to
improve the effectiveness of the Department
of Defense (DOD) processes for identifying
and deploying relevant DOD technology to
federal, State, and local first
responders."
In other words, the law
facilitates the "transfer" of the
newest in so-called "crowd
control" technology and other weaponry
designed to suppress dissent from the
Pentagon to local militarized police units.
The new law builds on and further codifies
earlier "technology transfer"
agreements, specifically the 1995
DOD-Justice Department memorandum of
agreement achieved back during the
Clinton-Reno regime.(4)
It has become clear in
recent months that a critical mass of the
American people have seen through the lies
of the Bush administration; with the
president's polls at an historic low,
growing resistance to the war Iraq, and the
Democrats likely to take back the Congress
in mid-term elections, the Bush
administration is on the ropes. And so it is
particularly worrying that President Bush
has seen fit, at this juncture to, in
effect, declare himself dictator.
Back
to top
|
BLACK
PEOPLE, PLEASE, READ & HEED. POIGNANT.
The sad thing about this article is that
the essence of it is true. The truth
hurts. I just hope this sets more Black
people in motion towards making real
progress. Chris Rock, a Black comedian,
even joked that Blacks don't read.
Help prove them wrong! Read and pass on.
Please Note:
For those of you who heard it, this is the
article Dee Lee was reading this morning
on a New York radio station. For those of
you who didn't hear it, this is very deep.
This is a heavy piece and a Caucasian
wrote it.
Yes, we will continue to contain them as
long as they refuse to read, continue to
buy anything they want, and keep thinking
they are "helping" their
communities by paying dues to
organizations which do little other than
hold lavish conventions in our hotels. By
the way, don't worry about any of them
reading this letter, remember, 'THEY DON'T
READ!!!!
(Prove them wrong. Please pass this on
after reading it.) Dee Lee, CFP
Harvard
Financial Educators
Dee Lee
Back
to top
THEY ARE STILL OUR SLAVES. We can
continue to reap profits from the Blacks
without the effort of physical slavery
Look at the current methods of containment
that they use on themselves: IGNORANCE,
GREED, and SELFISHNESS.
Their
IGNORANCE is the primary weapon
of containment. A great man once said,
"The best way to hide something from
Black people is to put it in a book."
We now live in the Information Age. They
have gained the opportunity to read any
book on any subject through the efforts of
their fight for freedom, yet they refuse
to read. There are numerous books readily
available at Borders, Barnes & Noble,
and Amazon.com, not to mention their own
Black Bookstores that provide solid
blueprints to reach economic equality
(which should have been their fight all
along), but few read consistently, if at
all.
GREED
is another powerful weapon of containment.
Blacks, since the abolition of slavery,
have had large amounts of money at their
disposal. Last year they spent 10
billion dollars during Christmas, out of
their 450 billion dollars in total yearly
income (2.22%).
Any of us can use them as our target
market, for any business venture we care
to dream up, no matter how outlandish,
they will buy into it. Being
primarily a consumer people, they function
totally by greed. They continually want
more, with little thought for saving or
investing.
They would rather buy some new sneaker
than invest in starting a business. Some
even neglect their children to have the
latest Tommy or FUBU, and they still think
that having a Mercedes, and a big house
gives them "Status" or that they
have achieved their Dream.
They are fools! The vast majority of their
people are still in poverty because their
greed holds them back from collectively
making better communities.
With the help of BET, and the rest of
their black media that often broadcasts
destructive images into their own homes,
we will continue to see huge profits like
those of Tommy and Nike. (Tommy Hilfiger
has even jeered them, saying he doesn't
want their money, and look at how the
fools spend more with him than ever
before!). They'll continue to show off to
each other while we build solid
communities with the profits from our
businesses that we market to them.
SELFISHNESS,
ingrained in their minds through slavery,
is one of the major ways we can continue
to contain them. One of their own, Dubois
said that there was an innate division in
their culture. A "Talented
Tenth" he called it. He was correct
in his deduction that there are segments
of their culture that has achieved some
"form" of success. However,
that segment missed the fullness of his
work. They didn't read that the
"Talented Tenth" was then
responsible to aid The Non-Talented Ninety
Percent in achieving a better life.
Instead, that segment has created another
class, a Buppie class that looks down on
their people or aids them in a
condescending manner. They will never
achieve what we have. Their selfishness
does not allow them to be able to work
together on any project or endeavor of
substance. When they do get together,
their selfishness lets their egos get in
the way of their goal. Their
so-called help organizations seem to only
want to promote their name without making
any real change in their community.
They are content to sit in conferences and
conventions in our hotels, and talk about
what they will do, while they award
plaques to the best speakers, not to the
best doers. Is there no end to their
selfishness? They steadfastly refuse
to see that TOGETHER
EACH ACHIEVES MORE (TEAM).
They do not understand that they are no
better than each other because of what
they own, as a matter of fact, most of
those Buppies are but one or two pay
checks away from poverty. All of which is
under the control of our pens in our
offices and our rooms.
Back
to top
|
What is on the Back of the Two Dollar Bill?

The
back of the $2 bill has an engraving of the signing
of the Declaration of Independence. In the image is
a man who has dark skin and wearing a powdered wig
while sitting at the table just to the left of the
men standing in the center of the engraving. This
dark skinned man is John Hanson in his position as
president of the continental congress.
In the original painting hanging in the U.S. Capitol
Rotunda, the dark skinned man does not appear!!!
A
"Black" Man, A Moor, John Hanson
Was
the First President of the United States! 1781-1782
A.D.???
George Washington was really the 8th President of
the United States!
George Washington was not the first President of the
United States. In fact, the first President of the
United States was one John Hanson. Don't go checking
the encyclopedia for this guy's name - he is one of
those great men that are lost to history. If you're
extremely lucky, you may actually find a brief
mention of his name.
The new country was actually formed on March 1, 1781
with the adoption of The Articles of Confederation.
This document was actually proposed on June 11,
1776, but not agreed upon by Congress until November
15, 1777. Maryland refused to sign this document
until Virginia and New York ceded their western
lands (Maryland was afraid that these states would
gain too much power in the new government from such
large amounts of land).
Once the signing took place in 1781, a President was
needed to run the country. John Hanson was chosen
unanimously by Congress (which included George
Washington). In fact, all the other potential
candidates refused to run against him, as he was a
major player in the revolution and an extremely
influential member of Congress.
As the first President, Hanson had quite the shoes
to fill. No one had ever been President and the role
was poorly defined. His actions in office would set
precedent for all future Presidents.
He took office just as the Revolutionary War ended.
Almost immediately, the troops demanded to be paid.
As would be expected after any long war, there were
no funds to meet the salaries. As a result, the
soldiers threatened to overthrow the new government
and put Washington on the throne as a monarch.
All the members of Congress ran for their lives,
leaving Hanson as the only guy left running the
government. He somehow managed to calm the troops
down and hold the country together. If he had
failed, the government would have fallen almost
immediately and everyone would have been bowing to
King Washington. In fact, Hanson sent 800 pounds of
sterl ing silver by his brother Samuel Hanson to
George Washington to provide the troops with shoes.
Hanson, as President, ordered all foreign troops off
American soil, as well as the removal of all foreign
flags. This was quite the feat, considering the fact
that so many European countries had a stake in the
United States since the days following Columbus.
Back to
top
|
 |
| OPERATION
TIMBUKTU
Saving the
Timbuktu Manuscripts
South Africa has thrown its
weight behind efforts to preserve the priceless
Timbuktu Manuscripts, ancient documents that hold
the key to some of the secrets of the continent's
history and cultural heritage - and shatter the
conventional historical view of Africa as a purely
"oral continent".
A consortium of South African
businessmen plans to build a new library to house
between 200 000 and 300 000 ancient manuscripts
currently housed in 24 private libraries in and
around the Malian city, and to train local
librarians in the preservation of a treasure trove
that is threatening, literally, to disintegrate.
"Operation Timbuktu"
is the first official cultural project of the New
Partnership for Africa's Development (Nepad), the
socio-economic revival plan of the African Union.
It is also a South African
presidential project, co-ordinated by the Presidency
and the Department of Arts and Culture through the
National Archives in Pretoria, that aims to make
good on an offer of help to the Malian government
made by President Thabo Mbeki during a state visit
in 2001.
Ancient
African texts
The Timbuktu Manuscripts - or Mali Manuscripts -
some of which date back to the 13th century, are
Arabic and African texts that hark back to city's
glorious past, when Muslim merchants would trade
gold from West Africa to Europe and the Middle East
in return for salt and other goods.
Long-since a symbol in Western
popular imagination for remote and exotic
destinations, Timbuktu 500 years ago was not only a
wealthy trading port, but also a centre for
academics and scholars of religion, literature and
science.
The manuscripts point to the
fact that Africa has a rich legacy of written
history, contrary to popular opinion that oral
tradition alone preserved its heritage.
The largest collection of
manuscripts, many from ancient libraries, is housed
in the Ahmed Baba Institute, named after the famous
15th century Timbuktu scholar Ahmed Baba. The rest
of the ancient texts are housed in the private
libraries of families in and around the city.
Amid fears that many of the
manuscripts - vulnerable to insects and Mali's
annual rainy season, albeit a short one - are
deteriorating, a number of initiatives been
undertaken to ensure that the priceless texts are
properly restored and suitably housed.
"There have been various
attempts from the US and Europe to help preserve the
texts, but none really came to anything",
University of Cape Town historian Shamil Jeppie told
Business Day. "We hope to be the first to
really help Mali in this regard."
South
African involvement
Following Mbeki's offer of help in 2001, South
Africa and Mali launched a trust fund to elicit
funds from the public both to upgrade the Ahmed Baba
Institute and to finance the building of a new
library equipped with the necessary technology to
preserve the manuscripts.
South Africa also began
sharing with Mali its own technical expertise on
preserving ancient documents: training programmes
for Malian archivists have started at South African
institutions
Last month, Jeppie led a team
of South African architects and engineers to Mali to
evaluate the project to build a new library.
Adam Essa, director of project
developers Coessa Holdings, told Business Day that
the facility would be built opposite the historic
Sankore mosque, close to Timbuktu's old quarter, a
Unesco World Heritage Site. Construction, he said,
could begin as soon as December.
According to Jeppie, the cost
of building the library - estimates put it in the
region of R13.5-million - will be borne entirely by
the companies involved, along with a hoped-for
R5-million boost from a gala fundraising banquet
taking place at the Cape Town International
Convention Centre on 8 April.
Local businesses have been
invited to "buy in" to the project by
sponsoring tables at the dinner, which will be
hosted by Mbeki and Western Cape Premier Ebrahim
Rasool.
"Those who pay the most
will have their own table and will be sitting with
the President, others with Minister of Finance
Trevor Manuel, MECs, the mayor, etc", Rasool
said. (Those interested can contact Edel on 021
483-4212 or 083 369-3151.)
Western Cape financial
services group Oasis has already pledged
R3.5-million to the project, Business Day reports.
The 'song
and dance' stereotype
Widespread interest in the Timbuktu Manuscripts was
kindled in 1999 when an American professor of
religion and history, John Hunwick, came across some
of the documents in an old trunk in a family library
in Timbuktu.
Hunwick was keen to show how
the documents pointed to the existence of written
records of Africa's civilisation.
Where previously the continent
was thought to have relied on "oral
tradition" alone to pass on its history, the
texts show a wealth of documentation - manuscripts,
letters, books - on issues as wide-ranging as
justice, religion, philosophy and history from
hundreds of years ago.
"Africa has for too long
been stereotyped as the continent of song and dance,
where knowledge is only transmitted orally",
Hunwick said at the time. "We want to
demonstrate that Africans think and write and have
done so for centuries."
According to Jeppie, who has
seen some of the manuscripts, they include
mathematical and scientific texts covering
astronomy, medicine and geomancy.
While most are in Arabic, some
are in indigenous languages such as Songhai and
Hausa, written using Arabic script.
Centre of
trade and scholarship
Timbuktu was founded in around 1100 by ethnic Tuareg
nomads near the northern-most bend of the Niger
River. Their caravans took salt from Saharan mines
to trade for gold and slaves, transported along the
river from the south, and by 1330 Timbuktu was part
of the Malian empire.
Two centuries later the city
was at the height of its grandeur under the Songhai
empire. Timbuktu was described by Spanish Moor Leo
Africanus as a centre for "doctors, judges,
priests and other learned men (who) are bountifully
maintained at the king's expense".
It was also a centre of
learning, where thousands of students were taught
and large private libraries kept.
But Timbuktu's fortunes sank
in 1591 when Songhai was defeated by a Moroccan
army. When Portuguese explorers discovered new trade
routes along the West African coast, Mali was
sidelined. Under France's rule the country continued
to slide into poverty and isolation.
Shining a
light on the future
While Timbuktu remains a poor, dusty city, visitors
still flock there today to experience the aura of
mystique and legend that surrounds it.
And it is still home to many
philosophers and scholars of Islam, with Sankore
University catering to some 15 000 students.
Growing involvement from
several countries, including South Africa, in
helping to preserve the legacy of Timbuktu, have
kindled new interest in the city.
According to Timbuktu
philosopher and historian Ismael Diadie Haidara,
Timbuktu was inhabited for hundreds of years by
Muslims, Christians and Jews, who lived together in
peace up until the end of the 19th century.
The city may be steeped in
history, but Haidara believes it could also shine a
light on the future.
SouthAfrica.info reporter
|
Please
Don't Tell Martin by Bitter B
Thank you Ms. Coretta
for the grace, strength, and dignity that you
displayed. Since your wonderful husband was
assassinated by the bullets of fear and hate.
You know they killed
him because of their ignorance. Thank you for not
allowing bitterness and anger to engulf your very
existence.
Now that you are
reunited with Martin tell him that they are
stripping our rights away, day by day, but his fight
was not in vain. Tell him that although my
generation glorifies drugs, debases black women in
song, and calls us vulgar names? that his dream
still remains.
Our men no longer
celebrate our natural black beauty ? we have to have
long weaves, small waists, and big ole booties.
The videos are so
degrading, they mirror soft porn. Us Blacks own
television stations now, but that's all that's
shown.
Tell Martin that my
generation apologizes for its lack of respect for
his legacy and the dormancy of our elders, we might
as well call this the Civil Rights of Unvolvement
Era.
Tell him that
although we as black people make more than we've
ever seen, that we squander it on diamond clad
teeth, 24 inch rims, and designer clothes due to our
sagging self-esteem.
Tell Martin that our
babies are growing up without fathers, while the
mothers are catching buses just like he remembers.
Our children take to
the streets in droves, not to march or proclaim the
injustice of this nation, but to pledge their gang
affiliation.
I can't rhyme to this
next line.
On any night thugs
hang out while bullets ring out - not freedom.
And yes we continue
to be judged by the color of our skin by America but
I wonder most about the lack of the content of our
character.
Advise him that the
grand-daughters of the Civil Rights era are making
their money as strippers.
The Grand-sons of the
marchers are ignoring their sons and daughters and
hanging and slangin' on corners.
They're going to jail
in mass numbers, not for protesting, marching, or
defying racism, but because they commit illegal acts
to gain materialism.
Our children are
making babies, ignoring education, committing
felonious capers, I'd wish they'd read his
Birmingham Jail Papers.
Tell Martin that
those in the ghetto are not the only ones forgetting
his dream. There are those who've forgotten where
they came from because of a little cream.
Who refuse to give
back to the community, because their motto is ?More
for me?.
They've forgotten how
to lend a helping hand, to help their fellow man ?
all the while thinking, ?If I can make it, they
can?.
Looking down without
offering a leg up, getting on elevators with their
noses up.
Some of us are even
republicans now, but that's a very exclusive black
crowd.
Striving to get to
the top of the ladder, to make their pockets fatter
? instead of doing something that truly matters.
Leaving the ?hood? in
droves and only moving back when Whites buy up all
of the homes.
Tell Martin that we
still like to dance and sing, but not Negro
spirituals cuz we've got Beyonce grinding and
shaking her thing.
Ms. Coretta, this may
hurt poor Martin the most ? it just may seal the
deal, we as a people don't attend church anymore.
Cuz we've gotten a little education and found out
that God wasn't real.
For those of us who
still believe, it makes us want to holla, we've got
a pimp named Bishop and a Bishop named Dollar.
I don't know Ms.
Corretta, maybe you'd better not tell Martin that
for all that he's done to make us free, equal, and
just ? that we still migrate to the back of the bus.
I'll bet looking down? he doesn't recognize us.
We've forgotten how
to march, protest, and vote - but be at the club,
standing in line for hours ? in the freezing cold.
Sporting the latest
gear; stilettos, hoochie clothes, teeth that's
froze, and Tims ? driving cars with less tire more
rim. Dying to get in so that we can ?shake it fast?,
drop it like it's hot? ? forgetting the respect and
dignity that we were taught.
I neva' thought I'd
think this thought, but please don't eva' give
Martin your report. Ms. Coretta, maybe you should
just avoid mentioning my generation all togetha'.
Bitter B Released:
January 31st, 2006
Back
to top
|
Dear
Fellow HRB Chapter Presidents -
Harvard University announced that from now o n
undergraduate students from low-income families will
pay no tuition. In making the announcement,
Harvard's president, Lawrence H. Summers, said
"When only 10 percent of the students in Elite
higher education come from families in lower half of
the
income distribution, we are not doing enough.
We are not doing enough in bringing elite higher
education to the lower half of the income
distribution."
If you know of a family earning less than $40,000 a
year with an honor student graduating from high
school soon, Harvard University wants to pay the
tuition. The prestigious university recently
announced that from now on undergraduate students
from low-income families can go to Harvard for
free...no tuition and no student loans!
To find out more about
Harvard offering free tuition for families making
less than $40,000 a year, visit Harvard's financial
aid website at:
http://fao.fas.harvard.edu/
or call the school's financial aid office at
617-495-1581
Back to top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |